Underlying types except the interface hasn't changed much.
Removed xrpcclient.HandleXrpcErr() call as appview always expect
knotmirror with compatible API.
Signed-off-by: Seongmin Lee git@boltless.me
Underlying types except the interface hasn't changed much.
Removed xrpcclient.HandleXrpcErr() call as appview always expect
knotmirror with compatible API.
Signed-off-by: Seongmin Lee git@boltless.me
knotBackoff and reachability test
Underlying types except the interface hasn't changed much.
Removed `xrpcclient.HandleXrpcErr()` call as appview always expect
knotmirror with compatible API.
Signed-off-by: Seongmin Lee <git@boltless.me>
Underlying types except the interface hasn't changed much.
Removed `xrpcclient.HandleXrpcErr()` call as appview always expect
knotmirror with compatible API.
Signed-off-by: Seongmin Lee <git@boltless.me>
Underlying types except the interface hasn't changed much.
Removed `xrpcclient.HandleXrpcErr()` call as appview always expect
knotmirror with compatible API.
Signed-off-by: Seongmin Lee <git@boltless.me>
Underlying types except the interface hasn't changed much.
Removed `xrpcclient.HandleXrpcErr()` call as appview always expect
knotmirror with compatible API.
Signed-off-by: Seongmin Lee <git@boltless.me>
Yes.
we can't run appview without db syncing atproto repos
we can't run appview without knotmirror syncing git repos
simple as that
Just to confirm that this doesn't double up on /xrpc/xrpc/something right?
@lewis.moe Thank you for pointing out. Seems like I changed too much since testing it. I'll resubmit everything after testing everything again.
lgtm!
Underlying types except the interface hasn't changed much.
Removed `xrpcclient.HandleXrpcErr()` call as appview always expect
knotmirror with compatible API.
Signed-off-by: Seongmin Lee <git@boltless.me>
appview/config/config.go:49: can the appview be run without the knotmirror at all?