tjh.dev
Linux kernel
============
There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can
be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read
Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first.
In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or
``make pdfdocs``. The formatted documentation can also be read online at:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory,
several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation.
Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the
requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about
the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.
Linux kernel mirror (for testing)
git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
kernel
os
linux
1443245
3
927
Clone this repository
https://tangled.org/tjh.dev/kernel
https://tangled.org/did:plc:65gha4t3avpfpzmvpbwovss7/kernel
git@gordian.tjh.dev:tjh.dev/kernel
git@gordian.tjh.dev:did:plc:65gha4t3avpfpzmvpbwovss7/kernel
For self-hosted knots, clone URLs may differ based on your setup.
Download tar.gz
The pointer pwm is being initialized with a value that is never read and
it is being updated later with a new value. The initialization is
redundant and can be removed.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
There is a potential path in function ep93xx_pwm_apply where ret is
never assigned a value and it is checked for an error code. Fix this
by ensuring ret is zero'd in the success path to avoid this issue.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
Fixes: f6ef94edf0f6 ("pwm: ep93xx: Unfold legacy callbacks into ep93xx_pwm_apply()")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Use clk_prepare_enable()/clk_disable_unprepare() in preparation for switch
to Common Clock Framework.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This just puts the implementation of ep93xx_pwm_disable(),
ep93xx_pwm_enable() and ep93xx_pwm_config() into their only caller.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To ease review this reuses the formerly implemented callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Until pwmchip_remove() returns the PWM is supposed to work, so
pwmchip_remove() must be called before the clock is stopped.
The return value of pwmchip_remove doesn't need to be checked because
it returns zero anyhow and I plan to make it return void soon.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
vt8500_pwm_remove() is only called after vt8500_pwm_probe() returned
successfully. In this case driver data was set to a non-NULL value
and so chip can never be NULL.
While touching this code also put declaration and assignment in a single
line.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
The driver is supposed to stay functional until pwmchip_remove()
returns. So the reset must be asserted only after that.
pwmchip_remove() always returns 0, so the return code can be ignored
which keeps the tegra_pwm_remove() a bit simpler.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
There is no reason to enable the PWM clock just to assert the reset
control. (If the reset control depends on the clock this is a bug and
probably it doesn't because in .probe() the reset is deasserted without
the clock being enabled.)
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
tegra_pwm_remove() is only called after tegra_pwm_probe() successfully
completed. In this case platform_set_drvdata() was called with a
non-NULL value and so platform_get_drvdata(pdev) cannot return NULL.
Returning an error code from a platform_driver's remove function is
ignored anyway, so it's a good thing this exit path is gone.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Use devm_add_action_or_reset() instead of devres_alloc() and
devres_add(), which works the same. This will simplify the
code. There is no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
There are no users and seems no will come of the devm_pwm_put().
Remove the function.
While at it, slightly update documentation.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
README