Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8c1d14f3748105f4caeda01716d47af2fa41d11c.1615809009.git.metze@samba.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We never want to generate any SIGPIPE, -EPIPE only is much better.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/38961085c3ec49fd21550c7788f214d1ff02d2d4.1615908477.git.metze@samba.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Running sqpoll cancellations via task_work_run() is a bad idea because
it depends on other task works to be run, but those may be locked in
currently running task_work_run() because of how it's (splicing the list
in batches).

Enqueue and run them through a separate callback head, namely
struct io_sq_data::park_task_work. As a nice bonus we now precisely
control where it's run, that's much safer than guessing where it can
happen as it was before.

Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We already have helpers to run/add callback_head but taking ctx and
working with ctx->exit_task_work. Extract generic versions of them
implemented in terms of struct callback_head, it will be used later.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

If io_sq_thread_park() of one task got rescheduled right after
set_bit(), before it gets back to mutex_lock() there can happen
park()/unpark() by another task with SQPOLL locking again and
continuing running never seeing that first set_bit(SHOULD_PARK),
so won't even try to put the mutex down for parking.

It will get parked eventually when SQPOLL drops the lock for reschedule,
but may be problematic and will get in the way of further fixes.

Account number of tasks waiting for parking with a new atomic variable
park_pending and adjust SHOULD_PARK accordingly. It doesn't entirely
replaces SHOULD_PARK bit with this atomic var because it's convenient
to have it as a bit in the state and will help to do optimisations
later.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

io_sq_thread_finish() is called in io_ring_ctx_free(), so SQPOLL task is
potentially running submitting new requests. It's not a disaster because
of using a "try" variant of percpu_ref_get, but is far from nice.

Remove ctx from the sqd ctx list earlier, before cancellation loop, so
SQPOLL can't find it and so won't submit new requests.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

The only user of read-locking of sqd->rw_lock is sq_thread itself, which
is by definition alone, so we don't really need rw_semaphore, but mutex
will do. Replace it with a mutex, and kill read-to-write upgrading and
extra task_work handling in io_sq_thread().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

If io_req_complete_post() put not a final ref, we can't rely on the
request's ctx ref, and so ctx may potentially be freed while
complete_post() is in io_cqring_ev_posted()/etc.

In that case get an additional ctx reference, and put it in the end, so
protecting following io_cqring_ev_posted(). And also prolong ctx
lifetime until spin_unlock happens, as we do with mutexes, so added
percpu_ref_get() doesn't race with ctx free.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

It's racy to modify req->flags from a not owning context, e.g. linked
timeout calling req_set_fail_links() for the master request might race
with that request setting/clearing flags while being executed
concurrently. Just remove req_set_fail_links(prev) from
io_link_timeout_fn(), io_async_find_and_cancel() and functions down the
line take care of setting the fail bit.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Like we did for the personality idr, convert the IO buffer idr to use
XArray. This avoids a use-after-free on removal of entries, since idr
doesn't like doing so from inside an iterator, and it nicely reduces
the amount of code we need to support this feature.

Fixes: 5a2e745d4d43 ("io_uring: buffer registration infrastructure")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

With the freezer using the proper signaling to notify us of when it's
time to freeze a thread, we can re-enable normal freezer usage for the
IO threads. Ensure that SQPOLL, io-wq, and the io-wq manager call
try_to_freeze() appropriately, and remove the default setting of
PF_NOFREEZE from create_io_thread().

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Don't send fake signals to PF_IO_WORKER threads, they don't accept
signals. Just treat them like kthreads in this regard, all they need
is a wakeup as no forced kernel/user transition is needed.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

IORING_OP_ASYNC_CANCEL tries io-wq cancellation only for current task.
If it fails go over tctx_list and try it out for every single tctx.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>