KVM: x86: Take irqfds.lock when adding/deleting IRQ bypass producer

Take irqfds.lock when adding/deleting an IRQ bypass producer to ensure
irqfd->producer isn't modified while kvm_irq_routing_update() is running.
The only lock held when a producer is added/removed is irqbypass's mutex.

Fixes: 872768800652 ("KVM: x86: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER")
Cc: [e-mail]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[e-mail]>
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[e-mail]>

arch/x86/kvm/x86.c

···
 {
 	struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
 		container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
+	struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
 	int ret;
 
-	irqfd->producer = prod;
 	kvm_arch_start_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+	irqfd->producer = prod;
+
 	ret = kvm_x86_call(pi_update_irte)(irqfd->kvm,
 					   prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 1);
 	if (ret)
 		kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
+
+	spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+
 
 	return ret;
 }
···
 	int ret;
 	struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
 		container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
+	struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
 
 	WARN_ON(irqfd->producer != prod);
-	irqfd->producer = NULL;
 
 	/*
 	 * When producer of consumer is unregistered, we change back to
···
 	 * when the irq is masked/disabled or the consumer side (KVM
 	 * int this case doesn't want to receive the interrupts.
 	*/
+	spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+	irqfd->producer = NULL;
+
 	ret = kvm_x86_call(pi_update_irte)(irqfd->kvm,
 					   prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 0);
 	if (ret)
 		printk(KERN_INFO "irq bypass consumer (token %p) unregistration"
 		       " fails: %d\n", irqfd->consumer.token, ret);
+
+	spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+
 
 	kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
 }