rtmutex: Fix comment about why new_owner can be NULL in wake_futex_pi()

The comment about why rt_mutex_next_owner() can return NULL in
wake_futex_pi() is not the normal case.

Tracing the cause of why this occurs is more likely that waiter
simply timedout. But because it originally caused contention with
the futex, the owner will go into the kernel when it unlocks
the lock. Then it will hit this code path and
rt_mutex_next_owner() will return NULL.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

authored by Steven Rostedt and committed by Ingo Molnar f123c98e cb600d2f

+3 -4
+3 -4
kernel/futex.c
··· 791 791 new_owner = rt_mutex_next_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex); 792 792 793 793 /* 794 - * This happens when we have stolen the lock and the original 795 - * pending owner did not enqueue itself back on the rt_mutex. 796 - * Thats not a tragedy. We know that way, that a lock waiter 797 - * is on the fly. We make the futex_q waiter the pending owner. 794 + * It is possible that the next waiter (the one that brought 795 + * this owner to the kernel) timed out and is no longer 796 + * waiting on the lock. 798 797 */ 799 798 if (!new_owner) 800 799 new_owner = this->task;