fix uml-x86_64

__NR_syscall_max is done in x86_64 asm-offsets; do an equivalent in
uml kern_constants.h

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[e-mail]>
Acked-by: Jeff Dike <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[e-mail]>

arch/um/include/sysdep-x86_64/kernel-offsets.h

···
 #define OFFSET(sym, str, mem) \
 	DEFINE(sym, offsetof(struct str, mem));
 
+#define __NO_STUBS 1
+#undef __SYSCALL
+#undef _ASM_X86_64_UNISTD_H_
+#define __SYSCALL(nr, sym) [nr] = 1,
+static char syscalls[] = {
+#include <asm/arch/unistd.h>
+};
+
 void foo(void)
 {
 #include <common-offsets.h>
+DEFINE(UM_NR_syscall_max, sizeof(syscalls) - 1);
 }

arch/um/include/sysdep-x86_64/syscalls.h

···
 
 #include <linux/msg.h>
 #include <linux/shm.h>
+#include <kern_constants.h>
 
 typedef long syscall_handler_t(void);
 
···
 extern syscall_handler_t sys_modify_ldt;
 extern syscall_handler_t sys_arch_prctl;
 
-#define NR_syscalls (__NR_syscall_max + 1)
+#define NR_syscalls (UM_NR_syscall_max + 1)
 
 #endif

arch/um/sys-x86_64/syscall_table.c

···
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
 #include <linux/sys.h>
 #include <linux/cache.h>
+#include <kern_constants.h>
 
 #define __NO_STUBS
 
···
 
 extern void sys_ni_syscall(void);
 
-sys_call_ptr_t sys_call_table[__NR_syscall_max+1] __cacheline_aligned = {
+sys_call_ptr_t sys_call_table[UM_NR_syscall_max+1] __cacheline_aligned = {
 	/* Smells like a like a compiler bug -- it doesn't work when the & below is removed. */
-	[0 ... __NR_syscall_max] = &sys_ni_syscall,
+	[0 ... UM_NR_syscall_max] = &sys_ni_syscall,
 #include <asm-x86_64/unistd.h>
 };