pipe_rdwr_fasync: fix the error handling to prevent the leak/crash

If the second fasync_helper() fails, pipe_rdwr_fasync() returns the error
but leaves the file on ->fasync_readers.

This was always wrong, but since 233e70f4228e78eb2f80dc6650f65d3ae3dbf17c
"saner FASYNC handling on file close" we have the new problem. Because in
this case setfl() doesn't set FASYNC bit, __fput() will not do
->fasync(0), and we leak fasync_struct with ->fa_file pointing to the
freed file.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

authored by Oleg Nesterov and committed by Linus Torvalds e5bc49ba 8d0df7a3

+4 -4
+4 -4
fs/pipe.c
··· 699 int retval; 700 701 mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); 702 - 703 retval = fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &pipe->fasync_readers); 704 - 705 - if (retval >= 0) 706 retval = fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &pipe->fasync_writers); 707 - 708 mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); 709 710 if (retval < 0)
··· 699 int retval; 700 701 mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); 702 retval = fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &pipe->fasync_readers); 703 + if (retval >= 0) { 704 retval = fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &pipe->fasync_writers); 705 + if (retval < 0) /* this can happen only if on == T */ 706 + fasync_helper(-1, filp, 0, &pipe->fasync_readers); 707 + } 708 mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); 709 710 if (retval < 0)