selftests/bpf: add "any alignment" annotation for some tests

RISC-V does, in-general, not have "efficient unaligned access". When
testing the RISC-V BPF JIT, some selftests failed in the verification
due to misaligned access. Annotate these tests with the
F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS flag.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[e-mail]>

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c

···
 	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"invalid read past end of SK_MSG",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c

···
 	},
 	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
 	.result = REJECT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"check skb->hash half load not permitted, unaligned 3",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c

···
 		  .data64 = { 1ULL << 63 | 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jset32: BPF_X",
···
 		  .data64 = { 1ULL << 63 | 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jset32: min/max deduction",
···
 		  .data64 = { -1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jeq32: BPF_X",
···
 		  .data64 = { 1ULL << 63 | 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jeq32: min/max deduction",
···
 		  .data64 = { -1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jne32: BPF_X",
···
 		  .data64 = { 1ULL << 63 | 2, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jne32: min/max deduction",
···
 		  .data64 = { 0, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jge32: BPF_X",
···
 		  .data64 = { (UINT_MAX - 1) | 2ULL << 32, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jge32: min/max deduction",
···
 		  .data64 = { 0, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jgt32: BPF_X",
···
 		  .data64 = { (UINT_MAX - 1) | 2ULL << 32, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jgt32: min/max deduction",
···
 		  .data64 = { INT_MAX, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jle32: BPF_X",
···
 		  .data64 = { UINT_MAX, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jle32: min/max deduction",
···
 		  .data64 = { INT_MAX - 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jlt32: BPF_X",
···
 		  .data64 = { (INT_MAX - 1) | 3ULL << 32, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jlt32: min/max deduction",
···
 		  .data64 = { -2, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsge32: BPF_X",
···
 		  .data64 = { -2, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsge32: min/max deduction",
···
 		  .data64 = { 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsgt32: BPF_X",
···
 		  .data64 = { 0x7fffffff, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsgt32: min/max deduction",
···
 		  .data64 = { 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsle32: BPF_X",
···
 		  .data64 = { 0x7fffffff | 2ULL << 32, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jsle32: min/max deduction",
···
 		  .data64 = { 1, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jslt32: BPF_X",
···
 		  .data64 = { 0x7fffffff | 2ULL << 32, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jslt32: min/max deduction",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jset.c

···
 		  .data64 = { ~0ULL, }
 		},
 	},
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jset: sign-extend",
···
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 2,
 	.data = { 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, },
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"jset: known const compare",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c

···
 	.errstr_unpriv = "attempt to corrupt spilled",
 	.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv",
 	.result = REJECT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"check corrupted spill/fill, LSB",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c

···
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.errstr_unpriv = "",
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"spin_lock: test4 direct ld/st",
···
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.errstr_unpriv = "",
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"spin_lock: test5 call within a locked region",

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c

···
 	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 0xabcdef12,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"map access: unknown scalar += value_ptr, 3",
···
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
 	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
 	.retval = 0xabcdef12,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"map access: unknown scalar += value_ptr, 4",
···
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "R1 max value is outside of the array range",
 	.errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"map access: value_ptr += unknown scalar, 1",
···
 	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 0xabcdef12,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
 {
 	"map access: value_ptr += unknown scalar, 3",