locking/rwsem: Fix (possible) missed wakeup

Because wake_q_add() can imply an immediate wakeup (cmpxchg failure
case), we must not rely on the wakeup being delayed. However, commit:

e38513905eea ("locking/rwsem: Rework zeroing reader waiter->task")

relies on exactly that behaviour in that the wakeup must not happen
until after we clear waiter->task.

[ peterz: Added changelog. ]

Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[e-mail]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[e-mail]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[e-mail]>
Fixes: e38513905eea ("locking/rwsem: Rework zeroing reader waiter->task")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[e-mail]>

kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c

···
 		woken++;
 		tsk = waiter->task;
 
-		wake_q_add(wake_q, tsk);
+		get_task_struct(tsk);
 		list_del(&waiter->list);
 		/*
-		 * Ensure that the last operation is setting the reader
+		 * Ensure calling get_task_struct() before setting the reader
 		 * waiter to nil such that rwsem_down_read_failed() cannot
 		 * race with do_exit() by always holding a reference count
 		 * to the task to wakeup.
 		 */
 		smp_store_release(&waiter->task, NULL);
+		/*
+		 * Ensure issuing the wakeup (either by us or someone else)
+		 * after setting the reader waiter to nil.
+		 */
+		wake_q_add(wake_q, tsk);
+		/* wake_q_add() already take the task ref */
+		put_task_struct(tsk);
 	}
 
 	adjustment = woken * RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS - adjustment;