V4L/DVB (4380): Bttv: Revert VBI_OFFSET to previous value, it works better

A previous patch changed VBI_OFFSET to match what the datasheets say it
should be. However, the bt8x8 datasheets are wrong. The old value of
244 is closer to what is actually observed. The real value appears to
not be constant and is different for different chip revisions.
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@speakeasy.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>

authored by Trent Piepho and committed by Mauro Carvalho Chehab ddecbe11 8c313111

+10 -5
+10 -5
drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-vbi.c
··· 31 31 #include <asm/io.h> 32 32 #include "bttvp.h" 33 33 34 - /* Offset from line sync pulse leading edge (0H) in 1 / sampling_rate: 35 - bt8x8 /HRESET pulse starts at 0H and has length 64 / fCLKx1 (E|O_VTC 36 - HSFMT = 0). VBI_HDELAY (always 0) is an offset from the trailing edge 37 - of /HRESET in 1 / fCLKx1, and the sampling_rate tvnorm->Fsc is fCLKx2. */ 38 - #define VBI_OFFSET ((64 + 0) * 2) 34 + /* Offset from line sync pulse leading edge (0H) to start of VBI capture, 35 + in fCLKx2 pixels. According to the datasheet, VBI capture starts 36 + VBI_HDELAY fCLKx1 pixels from the tailing edgeof /HRESET, and /HRESET 37 + is 64 fCLKx1 pixels wide. VBI_HDELAY is set to 0, so this should be 38 + (64 + 0) * 2 = 128 fCLKx2 pixels. But it's not! The datasheet is 39 + Just Plain Wrong. The real value appears to be different for 40 + different revisions of the bt8x8 chips, and to be affected by the 41 + horizontal scaling factor. Experimentally, the value is measured 42 + to be about 244. */ 43 + #define VBI_OFFSET 244 39 44 40 45 #define VBI_DEFLINES 16 41 46 #define VBI_MAXLINES 32