bitops: Fix signedness of compile-time hweight implementations

Enabling '-Wsign-compare' compiler warnings on code that includes
include/linux/bitops.h can generate the following warning:

In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:10:0,
from <random filename>:48:
include/linux/bitops.h: In function 'hweight_long':
include/linux/bitops.h:77:26: error: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression [-Werror=sign-compare]

(converted to an error with -Werror)

This is due to the use of the logical negation operator '!' in the
__const_hweight8 macro in include/asm-generic/bitops/const_hweight.h.
The use of that operator here results in a signed value.

Fix by explicitly casting the __const_hweight8 macro expansion to
'unsigned int'. While here, clean up several checkpatch.pl warnings.

Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <[e-mail]>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[e-mail]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[e-mail]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[e-mail]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[e-mail]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.02.1312180459580.30198@tamien
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[e-mail]>

include/asm-generic/bitops/const_hweight.h

···
  * Compile time versions of __arch_hweightN()
  */
 #define __const_hweight8(w)		\
-      (	(!!((w) & (1ULL << 0))) +	\
-	(!!((w) & (1ULL << 1))) +	\
-	(!!((w) & (1ULL << 2))) +	\
-	(!!((w) & (1ULL << 3))) +	\
-	(!!((w) & (1ULL << 4))) +	\
-	(!!((w) & (1ULL << 5))) +	\
-	(!!((w) & (1ULL << 6))) +	\
-	(!!((w) & (1ULL << 7)))	)
+	((unsigned int)			\
+	 ((!!((w) & (1ULL << 0))) +	\
+	  (!!((w) & (1ULL << 1))) +	\
+	  (!!((w) & (1ULL << 2))) +	\
+	  (!!((w) & (1ULL << 3))) +	\
+	  (!!((w) & (1ULL << 4))) +	\
+	  (!!((w) & (1ULL << 5))) +	\
+	  (!!((w) & (1ULL << 6))) +	\
+	  (!!((w) & (1ULL << 7)))))
 
 #define __const_hweight16(w) (__const_hweight8(w)  + __const_hweight8((w)  >> 8 ))
 #define __const_hweight32(w) (__const_hweight16(w) + __const_hweight16((w) >> 16))