spi: spi-ti-qspi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <[e-mail]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[e-mail]>

drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c

···
 	dev_dbg(qspi->dev, "hz: %d, clock divider %d\n",
 			qspi->spi_max_frequency, clk_div);
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(qspi->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(qspi->dev);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(qspi->dev);
 		dev_err(qspi->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed\n");
 		return ret;
 	}