asm-generic: uaccess: fix up local access_ok() usage

There's no reason that I can see to use the short __access_ok() form
directly when the access_ok() is clearer in intent and for most people,
expands to the same C code (i.e. always specify the first field -- access
type). Not all no-mmu systems lack memory protection, so the read/write
could feasibly be checked.

Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[e-mail]>

include/asm-generic/uaccess.h

···
 #define put_user(x, ptr)					\
 ({								\
 	might_sleep();						\
-	__access_ok(ptr, sizeof (*ptr)) ?			\
+	access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, ptr, sizeof(*ptr)) ?		\
 		__put_user(x, ptr) :				\
 		-EFAULT;					\
 })
···
 #define get_user(x, ptr)					\
 ({								\
 	might_sleep();						\
-	__access_ok(ptr, sizeof (*ptr)) ?			\
+	access_ok(VERIFY_READ, ptr, sizeof(*ptr)) ?		\
 		__get_user(x, ptr) :				\
 		-EFAULT;					\
 })
···
 		const void __user * from, unsigned long n)
 {
 	might_sleep();
-	if (__access_ok(from, n))
+	if (access_ok(VERIFY_READ, from, n))
 		return __copy_from_user(to, from, n);
 	else
 		return n;
···
 		const void *from, unsigned long n)
 {
 	might_sleep();
-	if (__access_ok(to, n))
+	if (access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, to, n))
 		return __copy_to_user(to, from, n);
 	else
 		return n;
···
 static inline long
 strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src, long count)
 {
-	if (!__access_ok(src, 1))
+	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, src, 1))
 		return -EFAULT;
 	return __strncpy_from_user(dst, src, count);
 }
···
 clear_user(void __user *to, unsigned long n)
 {
 	might_sleep();
-	if (!__access_ok(to, n))
+	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, to, n))
 		return n;
 
 	return __clear_user(to, n);