Reinstate some of "swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE""

Halil Pasic points out [1] that the full revert of that commit (revert
in bddac7c1e02b), and that a partial revert that only reverts the
problematic case, but still keeps some of the cleanups is probably
better. 

And that partial revert [2] had already been verified by Oleksandr
Natalenko to also fix the issue, I had just missed that in the long
discussion.

So let's reinstate the cleanups from commit aa6f8dcbab47 ("swiotlb:
rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE""), and effectively only
revert the part that caused problems.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[e-mail]/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[e-mail]/ [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[e-mail]/ [3]
Suggested-by: Halil Pasic <[e-mail]>
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <[e-mail]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig" <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[e-mail]>

Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst

···
 subsystem that the buffer is fully accessible at the elevated privilege
 level (and ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at the
 lesser-privileged levels).
-
-DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE
-------------------
-
-This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected to
-overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any of the
-previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows bounce-buffering
-implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers.

include/linux/dma-mapping.h

···
 #define DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED		(1UL << 9)
 
 /*
- * This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected
- * to overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any
- * of the previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows
- * bounce-buffering implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers.
- */
-#define DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE		(1UL << 10)
-
-/*
  * A dma_addr_t can hold any valid DMA or bus address for the platform.  It can
  * be given to a device to use as a DMA source or target.  It is specific to a
  * given device and there may be a translation between the CPU physical address

kernel/dma/swiotlb.c

···
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_slots(alloc_size + offset); i++)
 		mem->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i);
 	tlb_addr = slot_addr(mem->start, index) + offset;
-	if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
-	    (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE) || dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE ||
-	    dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
-		swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+	/*
+	 * When dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE we could omit the copy from the orig
+	 * to the tlb buffer, if we knew for sure the device will
+	 * overwirte the entire current content. But we don't. Thus
+	 * unconditional bounce may prevent leaking swiotlb content (i.e.
+	 * kernel memory) to user-space.
+	 */
+	swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
 	return tlb_addr;
 }