mn10300: Fix incorrect use of irq_data->affinity

The field affinity in struct irq_data is type of cpumask_var_t, so
we should pass in data->affinity instead of &data->affinity when
calling cpumask_xxxx().

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <[e-mail]>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[e-mail]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <[e-mail]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[e-mail]>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[e-mail]>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <[e-mail]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[e-mail]>
Cc: David Howells <[e-mail]>
Cc: Koichi Yasutake <[e-mail]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[e-mail]>

arch/mn10300/kernel/irq.c

···
 		if (irqd_is_per_cpu(data))
 			continue;
 
-		if (cpumask_test_cpu(self, &data->affinity) &&
+		if (cpumask_test_cpu(self, data->affinity) &&
 		    !cpumask_intersects(&irq_affinity[irq], cpu_online_mask)) {
 			int cpu_id;
 			cpu_id = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
-			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu_id, &data->affinity);
+			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu_id, data->affinity);
 		}
 		/* We need to operate irq_affinity_online atomically. */
 		arch_local_cli_save(flags);
···
 			GxICR(irq) = x & GxICR_LEVEL;
 			tmp = GxICR(irq);
 
-			new = cpumask_any_and(&data->affinity,
+			new = cpumask_any_and(data->affinity,
 					      cpu_online_mask);
 			irq_affinity_online[irq] = new;