perf/arm-cmn: Fix PMU instance naming

Although it's neat to avoid the suffix for the typical case of a
single PMU, it means systems with multiple CMN instances end up with
inconsistent naming. I think it also breaks perf tool's "uncore alias"
logic if the common instance prefix is also the full name of one.

Avoid any surprises by not trying to be clever and simply numbering
every instance, even when it might technically prove redundant.

Fixes: 0ba64770a2f2 ("perf: Add Arm CMN-600 PMU driver")
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[e-mail]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/649a[e-mail]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[e-mail]>

Documentation/admin-guide/perf/arm-cmn.rst

···
 ----------
 
 The PMU driver registers a single PMU device for the whole interconnect,
-see /sys/bus/event_source/devices/arm_cmn. Multi-chip systems may link
+see /sys/bus/event_source/devices/arm_cmn_0. Multi-chip systems may link
 more than one CMN together via external CCIX links - in this situation,
 each mesh counts its own events entirely independently, and additional
 PMU devices will be named arm_cmn_{1..n}.

drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c

···
 	struct arm_cmn *cmn;
 	const char *name;
 	static atomic_t id;
-	int err, rootnode, this_id;
+	int err, rootnode;
 
 	cmn = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cmn), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!cmn)
···
 		.cancel_txn = arm_cmn_end_txn,
 	};
 
-	this_id = atomic_fetch_inc(&id);
-	if (this_id == 0) {
-		name = "arm_cmn";
-	} else {
-		name = devm_kasprintf(cmn->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "arm_cmn_%d", this_id);
-		if (!name)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	name = devm_kasprintf(cmn->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "arm_cmn_%d", atomic_fetch_inc(&id));
+	if (!name)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	err = cpuhp_state_add_instance(arm_cmn_hp_state, &cmn->cpuhp_node);
 	if (err)