Merge branch 'xfrm: fixes for xfrm_state_find under preemption'

Sabrina Dubroca says:

====================
While looking at the pcpu_id changes, I found two issues that can
happen if we get preempted and the cpu_id changes. The second patch
takes care of both problems. The first patch also makes sure we don't
use state_ptrs uninitialized, which could currently happen. syzbot
seems to have hit this issue [1].

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7ed9d47e15e88581dc5b
====================

Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <[e-mail]>

net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c

···
 static void xfrm_state_look_at(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct xfrm_state *x,
 			       const struct flowi *fl, unsigned short family,
 			       struct xfrm_state **best, int *acq_in_progress,
-			       int *error)
+			       int *error, unsigned int pcpu_id)
 {
-	/* We need the cpu id just as a lookup key,
-	 * we don't require it to be stable.
-	 */
-	unsigned int pcpu_id = get_cpu();
-	put_cpu();
-
 	/* Resolution logic:
 	 * 1. There is a valid state with matching selector. Done.
 	 * 2. Valid state with inappropriate selector. Skip.
···
 	/* We need the cpu id just as a lookup key,
 	 * we don't require it to be stable.
 	 */
-	pcpu_id = get_cpu();
-	put_cpu();
+	pcpu_id = raw_smp_processor_id();
 
 	to_put = NULL;
 
 	sequence = read_seqcount_begin(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_hash_generation);
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
+	xfrm_hash_ptrs_get(net, &state_ptrs);
+
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(x, &pol->state_cache_list, state_cache) {
 		if (x->props.family == encap_family &&
 		    x->props.reqid == tmpl->reqid &&
···
 		    tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
 		    (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
 			xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, encap_family,
-					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
+					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
 	}
 
 	if (best)
···
 		    tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
 		    (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
 			xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family,
-					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
+					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
 	}
 
 cached:
···
 		best = NULL;
 	else if (acquire_in_progress) /* XXX: acquire_in_progress should not happen */
 		WARN_ON(1);
-
-	xfrm_hash_ptrs_get(net, &state_ptrs);
 
 	h = __xfrm_dst_hash(daddr, saddr, tmpl->reqid, encap_family, state_ptrs.hmask);
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(x, state_ptrs.bydst + h, bydst) {
···
 		    tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
 		    (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
 			xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family,
-					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
+					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
 	}
 	if (best || acquire_in_progress)
 		goto found;
···
 		    tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
 		    (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
 			xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family,
-					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
+					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
 	}
 
 found: