x86/bugs: Fix BHI retpoline check

Confusingly, X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE doesn't mean retpolines are enabled,
as it also includes the original "AMD retpoline" which isn't a retpoline
at all.

Also replace cpu_feature_enabled() with boot_cpu_has() because this is
before alternatives are patched and cpu_feature_enabled()'s fallback
path is slower than plain old boot_cpu_has().

Fixes: ec9404e40e8f ("x86/bhi: Add BHI mitigation knob")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[e-mail]>
Reviewed-by: Pawan Gupta <[e-mail]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[e-mail]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[e-mail]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c

···
 		return;
 
 	/* Retpoline mitigates against BHI unless the CPU has RRSBA behavior */
-	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE)) {
+	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE) &&
+	    !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE_LFENCE)) {
 		spec_ctrl_disable_kernel_rrsba();
 		if (rrsba_disabled)
 			return;
···
 {
 	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_BHI))
 		return "; BHI: Not affected";
-	else if  (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_HW))
+	else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_HW))
 		return "; BHI: BHI_DIS_S";
-	else if  (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP))
+	else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP))
 		return "; BHI: SW loop, KVM: SW loop";
-	else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE) && rrsba_disabled)
+	else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE) &&
+		 !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE_LFENCE) &&
+		 rrsba_disabled)
 		return "; BHI: Retpoline";
 	else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP_ON_VMEXIT))
 		return "; BHI: Vulnerable, KVM: SW loop";