Input: elants_i2c - do not bind to i2c-hid compatible ACPI instantiated devices

Several users have been reporting that elants_i2c gives several errors
during probe and that their touchscreen does not work on their Lenovo AMD
based laptops with a touchscreen with a ELAN0001 ACPI hardware-id:

[ 0.550596] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: i2c-ELAN0001:00 supply vcc33 not found, using dummy regulator
[ 0.551836] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: i2c-ELAN0001:00 supply vccio not found, using dummy regulator
[ 0.560932] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (77 77 77 77): -121
[ 0.562427] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: software reset failed: -121
[ 0.595925] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (77 77 77 77): -121
[ 0.597974] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: software reset failed: -121
[ 0.621893] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (77 77 77 77): -121
[ 0.622504] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: software reset failed: -121
[ 0.632650] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (4d 61 69 6e): -121
[ 0.634256] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: boot failed: -121
[ 0.699212] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: invalid 'hello' packet: 00 00 ff ff
[ 1.630506] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: Failed to read fw id: -121
[ 1.645508] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: unknown packet 00 00 ff ff

Despite these errors, the elants_i2c driver stays bound to the device
(it returns 0 from its probe method despite the errors), blocking the
i2c-hid driver from binding.

Manually unbinding the elants_i2c driver and binding the i2c-hid driver
makes the touchscreen work.

Check if the ACPI-fwnode for the touchscreen contains one of the i2c-hid
compatiblity-id strings and if it has the I2C-HID spec's DSM to get the
HID descriptor address, If it has both then make elants_i2c not bind,
so that the i2c-hid driver can bind.

This assumes that non of the (older) elan touchscreens which actually
need the elants_i2c driver falsely advertise an i2c-hid compatiblity-id
+ DSM in their ACPI-fwnodes. If some of them actually do have this
false advertising, then this change may lead to regressions.

While at it also drop the unnecessary DEVICE_NAME prefixing of the
"I2C check functionality error", dev_err already outputs the driver-name.

BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207759
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[e-mail]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[e-mail]>

drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c

···
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/uuid.h>
 #include <asm/unaligned.h>
 
 /* Device, Driver information */
···
 	}
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_hid_ids[] = {
+	{"ACPI0C50", 0 },
+	{"PNP0C50", 0 },
+	{ },
+};
+
+static const guid_t i2c_hid_guid =
+	GUID_INIT(0x3CDFF6F7, 0x4267, 0x4555,
+		  0xAD, 0x05, 0xB3, 0x0A, 0x3D, 0x89, 0x38, 0xDE);
+
+static bool elants_acpi_is_hid_device(struct device *dev)
+{
+	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
+	union acpi_object *obj;
+
+	if (acpi_match_device_ids(ACPI_COMPANION(dev), i2c_hid_ids))
+		return false;
+
+	obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &i2c_hid_guid, 1, 1, NULL, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER);
+	if (obj) {
+		ACPI_FREE(obj);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+#else
+static bool elants_acpi_is_hid_device(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int elants_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 			    const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 {
···
 	unsigned long irqflags;
 	int error;
 
+	/* Don't bind to i2c-hid compatible devices, these are handled by the i2c-hid drv. */
+	if (elants_acpi_is_hid_device(&client->dev)) {
+		dev_warn(&client->dev, "This device appears to be an I2C-HID device, not binding\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
 	if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
-		dev_err(&client->dev,
-			"%s: i2c check functionality error\n", DEVICE_NAME);
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "I2C check functionality error\n");
 		return -ENXIO;
 	}