x86/bugs: Fix the AMD SSBD usage of the SPEC_CTRL MSR

On AMD, the presence of the MSR_SPEC_CTRL feature does not imply that the
SSBD mitigation support should use the SPEC_CTRL MSR. Other features could
have caused the MSR_SPEC_CTRL feature to be set, while a different SSBD
mitigation option is in place.

Update the SSBD support to check for the actual SSBD features that will
use the SPEC_CTRL MSR.

Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <[e-mail]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[e-mail]>
Cc: David Woodhouse <[e-mail]>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[e-mail]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[e-mail]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[e-mail]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[e-mail]>
Fixes: 6ac2f49edb1e ("x86/bugs: Add AMD's SPEC_CTRL MSR usage")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[e-mail]>

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c

···
 		guestval |= guest_spec_ctrl & x86_spec_ctrl_mask;
 
 		/* SSBD controlled in MSR_SPEC_CTRL */
-		if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL_SSBD))
+		if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL_SSBD) ||
+		    static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
 			hostval |= ssbd_tif_to_spec_ctrl(ti->flags);
 
 		if (hostval != guestval) {
···
 		 * Intel uses the SPEC CTRL MSR Bit(2) for this, while AMD may
 		 * use a completely different MSR and bit dependent on family.
 		 */
-		if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL))
+		if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL_SSBD) &&
+		    !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD)) {
 			x86_amd_ssb_disable();
-		else {
+		} else {
 			x86_spec_ctrl_base |= SPEC_CTRL_SSBD;
 			x86_spec_ctrl_mask |= SPEC_CTRL_SSBD;
 			wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, x86_spec_ctrl_base);