sparc64: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[e-mail]>

arch/sparc/kernel/cpumap.c

···
 
 	/* Offsets into nodes[] for each level of the tree */
 	struct cpuinfo_level level[CPUINFO_LVL_MAX];
-	struct cpuinfo_node  nodes[0];
+	struct cpuinfo_node  nodes[];
 };
 
 

arch/sparc/kernel/ds.c

···
 	__u64			handle;
 	__u16			major;
 	__u16			minor;
-	char			svc_id[0];
+	char			svc_id[];
 };
 
 struct ds_reg_ack {
···
 
 struct ds_var_set_msg {
 	struct ds_var_hdr		hdr;
-	char				name_and_value[0];
+	char				name_and_value[];
 };
 
 struct ds_var_delete_msg {
 	struct ds_var_hdr		hdr;
-	char				name[0];
+	char				name[];
 };
 
 struct ds_var_resp {
···
 	struct ds_info			*dp;
 	int				req_len;
 	int				__pad;
-	u64				req[0];
+	u64				req[];
 };
 
 static void process_ds_work(void)