dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document new Milos and Glymur SoCs

Extend the schema enforcing correct SoC-block naming to cover Milos
(compatibles already accepted by some maintainers for next release) and
Glymur (posted on mailing lists [1]) SoCs.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/[e-mail]/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[e-mail]>
Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <[e-mail]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <[e-mail]>

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml

···
 select:
   properties:
     compatible:
-      pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sa|sar|sc|sd[amx]|sm|x1[ep])[0-9]+.*$"
+      oneOf:
+        - pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sa|sar|sc|sd[amx]|sm|x1[ep])[0-9]+.*$"
+        - pattern: "^qcom,.*(glymur|milos).*$"
   required:
     - compatible
 
···
       - pattern: "^qcom,(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sa|sc|sd[amx]|sm|x1[ep])[0-9]+(pro)?-.*$"
       - pattern: "^qcom,sar[0-9]+[a-z]?-.*$"
       - pattern: "^qcom,(sa|sc)8[0-9]+[a-z][a-z]?-.*$"
+      - pattern: "^qcom,(glymur|milos)-.*$"
 
       # Legacy namings - variations of existing patterns/compatibles are OK,
       # but do not add completely new entries to these: