bcachefs: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic

This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1][2].

As the "op" variable is a pointer to "struct promote_op" and this
structure ends in a flexible array:

struct promote_op {
[...]
struct bio_vec bi_inline_vecs[];
};

and the "t" variable is a pointer to "struct journal_seq_blacklist_table"
and this structure also ends in a flexible array:

struct journal_seq_blacklist_table {
[...]
struct journal_seq_blacklist_table_entry {
u64 start;
u64 end;
bool dirty;
} entries[];
};

the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
do the arithmetic instead of the argument "size + size * count" in the
kzalloc() functions.

This way, the code is more readable and safer.

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 [2]
Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <[e-mail]>

fs/bcachefs/io_read.c

···
 	if (!bch2_write_ref_tryget(c, BCH_WRITE_REF_promote))
 		return ERR_PTR(-BCH_ERR_nopromote_no_writes);
 
-	op = kzalloc(sizeof(*op) + sizeof(struct bio_vec) * pages, GFP_KERNEL);
+	op = kzalloc(struct_size(op, bi_inline_vecs, pages), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!op) {
 		ret = -BCH_ERR_nopromote_enomem;
 		goto err;

fs/bcachefs/journal_seq_blacklist.c

···
 	if (!bl)
 		return 0;
 
-	t = kzalloc(sizeof(*t) + sizeof(t->entries[0]) * nr,
-		    GFP_KERNEL);
+	t = kzalloc(struct_size(t, entries, nr), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!t)
 		return -BCH_ERR_ENOMEM_blacklist_table_init;