selftests/mm: rename pkey register macro

PKEY_ALLOW_ALL is meant to represent the pkey register value that allows
all accesses (enables all pkeys). However its current naming suggests
that the value applies to *one* key only (like PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS for
instance).

Rename PKEY_ALLOW_ALL to PKEY_REG_ALLOW_ALL to avoid such
misunderstanding. This is consistent with the PKEY_REG_ALLOW_NONE macro
introduced by commit 6e182dc9f268 ("selftests/mm: Use generic pkey
register manipulation").

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]
Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <[e-mail]>
Cc: Aruna Ramakrishna <[e-mail]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[e-mail]>
Cc: Joey Gouly <[e-mail]>
Cc: Keith Lucas <[e-mail]>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <[e-mail]>
Cc: Shuah Khan <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[e-mail]>

tools/testing/selftests/mm/pkey-arm64.h

···
 #define NR_PKEYS		8
 #define NR_RESERVED_PKEYS	1 /* pkey-0 */
 
-#define PKEY_ALLOW_ALL		0x77777777
+#define PKEY_REG_ALLOW_ALL	0x77777777
 #define PKEY_REG_ALLOW_NONE	0x0
 
 #define PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY	4

tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c

···
 	/* restore access and let the faulting instruction continue */
 	pkey_access_allow(siginfo_pkey);
 #elif defined(__aarch64__)
-	aarch64_write_signal_pkey(uctxt, PKEY_ALLOW_ALL);
+	aarch64_write_signal_pkey(uctxt, PKEY_REG_ALLOW_ALL);
 #endif /* arch */
 	pkey_faults++;
 	dprintf1("<<<<==================================================\n");
···
 	 */
 	if (__read_pkey_reg() != 0)
 #elif defined(__aarch64__)
-	if (__read_pkey_reg() != PKEY_ALLOW_ALL)
+	if (__read_pkey_reg() != PKEY_REG_ALLOW_ALL)
 #else
 	if (__read_pkey_reg() != shadow_pkey_reg)
 #endif /* arch */