mm: Place preemption point in do_mlockall() loop

There is a loop in do_mlockall() that lacks a preemption point, which
means that the following can happen on non-preemptible builds of the
kernel. Dave Jones reports:

"My fuzz tester keeps hitting this. Every instance shows the non-irq
stack came in from mlockall. I'm only seeing this on one box, but
that has more ram (8gb) than my other machines, which might explain
it.

INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU { 3} (t=6500 jiffies g=470344 c=470343 q=0)
sending NMI to all CPUs:
NMI backtrace for cpu 3
CPU: 3 PID: 29664 Comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.11.0-rc1+ #32
Call Trace:
lru_add_drain_all+0x15/0x20
SyS_mlockall+0xa5/0x1a0
tracesys+0xdd/0xe2"

This commit addresses this problem by inserting the required preemption
point.

Reported-by: Dave Jones <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[e-mail]>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <[e-mail]>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <[e-mail]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[e-mail]>

mm/mlock.c

···
 
 		/* Ignore errors */
 		mlock_fixup(vma, &prev, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, newflags);
+		cond_resched();
 	}
 out:
 	return 0;