bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers

Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate
packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call
invalidates packet pointers.

Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes
use of check_cfg() logic that computes 'changes_pkt_data' effect for
global sub-programs, such that the following program could be
rejected:

int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &jmp_table, 0);
return 0;
}

SEC("tc")
int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data;
... make p valid ...
tail_call(sk);
*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */
...
}

The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that
can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can't be freplaced with
tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[e-mail]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[e-mail]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[e-mail]>

net/core/filter.c

···
 	case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_head:
 	case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_meta:
 	case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_tail:
+	/* tail-called program could call any of the above */
+	case BPF_FUNC_tail_call:
 		return true;
 	default:
 		return false;

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c

···
 
 	__sink(skb);
 	__sink(ret);
+	/* let verifier know that 'subprog_tc' can change pointers to skb->data */
+	bpf_skb_change_proto(skb, 0, 0);
 	return ret;
 }