Merge branch 'mptcp-mem-scheduling'

Mat Martineau says:

====================
mptcp: Updates for mem scheduling and SK_RECLAIM

In the "net: reduce tcp_memory_allocated inflation" series (merge commit
e10b02ee5b6c), Eric Dumazet noted that "Removal of SK_RECLAIM_CHUNK and
SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD is left to MPTCP maintainers as a follow up."

Patches 1-3 align MPTCP with the above TCP changes to forward memory
allocation, reclaim, and memory scheduling.

Patch 4 removes the SK_RECLAIM_* macros as Eric requested.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[e-mail]>

include/net/sock.h

···
 	sk->sk_forward_alloc -= size;
 }
 
-/* the following macros control memory reclaiming in mptcp_rmem_uncharge()
- */
-#define SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD	(1 << 21)
-#define SK_RECLAIM_CHUNK	(1 << 20)
-
 static inline void sk_mem_uncharge(struct sock *sk, int size)
 {
 	if (!sk_has_account(sk))

net/mptcp/protocol.c

···
 	reclaimable = msk->rmem_fwd_alloc - sk_unused_reserved_mem(sk);
 
 	/* see sk_mem_uncharge() for the rationale behind the following schema */
-	if (unlikely(reclaimable >= SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD))
-		__mptcp_rmem_reclaim(sk, SK_RECLAIM_CHUNK);
+	if (unlikely(reclaimable >= PAGE_SIZE))
+		__mptcp_rmem_reclaim(sk, reclaimable);
 }
 
 static void mptcp_rfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
···
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 	int amt, amount;
 
-	if (size < msk->rmem_fwd_alloc)
+	if (size <= msk->rmem_fwd_alloc)
 		return true;
 
+	size -= msk->rmem_fwd_alloc;
 	amt = sk_mem_pages(size);
 	amount = amt << PAGE_SHIFT;
-	msk->rmem_fwd_alloc += amount;
-	if (!__sk_mem_raise_allocated(sk, size, amt, SK_MEM_RECV)) {
-		if (ssk->sk_forward_alloc < amount) {
-			msk->rmem_fwd_alloc -= amount;
-			return false;
-		}
+	if (!__sk_mem_raise_allocated(sk, size, amt, SK_MEM_RECV))
+		return false;
 
-		ssk->sk_forward_alloc -= amount;
-	}
+	msk->rmem_fwd_alloc += amount;
 	return true;
 }
 
···
 		df->data_seq + df->data_len == msk->write_seq;
 }
 
-static void __mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(struct sock *sk)
-{
-	int reclaimable = mptcp_sk(sk)->rmem_fwd_alloc - sk_unused_reserved_mem(sk);
-
-	lockdep_assert_held_once(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
-
-	if (reclaimable > (int)PAGE_SIZE)
-		__mptcp_rmem_reclaim(sk, reclaimable - 1);
-
-	sk_mem_reclaim(sk);
-}
-
-static void mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(struct sock *sk)
-{
-	mptcp_data_lock(sk);
-	__mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
-	mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
-}
-
 static void dfrag_uncharge(struct sock *sk, int len)
 {
 	sk_mem_uncharge(sk, len);
···
 {
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dtmp, *dfrag;
-	bool cleaned = false;
 	u64 snd_una;
 
 	/* on fallback we just need to ignore snd_una, as this is really
···
 		}
 
 		dfrag_clear(sk, dfrag);
-		cleaned = true;
 	}
 
 	dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
···
 		dfrag->already_sent -= delta;
 
 		dfrag_uncharge(sk, delta);
-		cleaned = true;
 	}
 
 	/* all retransmitted data acked, recovery completed */
···
 		msk->recovery = false;
 
 out:
-	if (cleaned && tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk))
-		__mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
-
 	if (snd_una == READ_ONCE(msk->snd_nxt) &&
 	    snd_una == READ_ONCE(msk->write_seq)) {
 		if (mptcp_timer_pending(sk) && !mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk))
···
 {
 	gfp_t gfp = data_lock_held ? GFP_ATOMIC : sk->sk_allocation;
 
-	if (unlikely(tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk))) {
-		if (data_lock_held)
-			__mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
-		else
-			mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
-	}
 	return __mptcp_alloc_tx_skb(sk, ssk, gfp);
 }