legacy field name patch is preserved (but not used) to support some
level of backward compatibility
Signed-off-by: Seongmin Lee git@boltless.me
patch with patchBlob
#871
legacy field name patch is preserved (but not used) to support some
level of backward compatibility
Signed-off-by: Seongmin Lee git@boltless.me
patch with patchBlob
legacy field name `patch` is preserved (but not used) to support some
level of backward compatibility
Signed-off-by: Seongmin Lee <git@boltless.me>
largely lgtm to me otherwise!
of course. before squashing them, @oppi.li should I follow the official lexicon style guideline about schema evolution?
Not sure how important record validation is in atproto.
i think the code is fine at present, no need to change the lexicons any further.
can we squash these two PRs into one?