Agent Action Record #
Review date: Reviewed by: Agent / system: Task or period under review: Accountable human (name or role):
1. Intent — what was supposed to happen #
Instruction given (actual wording):
Success defined in advance as:
Authority granted to the agent:
Out of scope:
2. Action — what actually happened #
What the agent did (step by step, from logs where available):
What it produced or changed:
Where actual behavior differed from the instruction:
Stayed within granted authority? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
3. Judgment — human in the loop #
Decisions the agent made on its own:
Of those, which should a human have made or seen:
Where a human actually intervened (approve / edit / override / redirect):
Points where it should have escalated and didn't:
Accountable for these actions:
4. Deviation — the gaps #
Gaps between intent and action, and why (root cause, not first answer):
Good deviations (correct departures from a flawed instruction):
Confidently wrong (high confidence + wrong — flag specifically):
5. Consequence — what it cost or risked #
Actual outcome (did the work hold up):
Harm / cost / risk — realized or narrowly avoided:
Downstream affected parties:
Expected failure if this run happened 100 times:
6. Change — what happens next #
Specific changes before next run (instruction / scope / authority / escalation / checkpoints):
Keep doing:
Should not be delegated to an agent at all:
Signal that the change worked: