pyrox.dev
lol
python312Packages.plotpy: put failing passthru.tests aside
+14
-9
+14
-9
pkgs/development/python-modules/plotpy/default.nix
+14
-9
pkgs/development/python-modules/plotpy/default.nix
···
85
85
86
86
passthru = {
87
87
tests = {
88
-
# Upstream doesn't officially supports all of them, although they use
89
-
# qtpy, see: https://github.com/PlotPyStack/PlotPy/issues/20 . When this
90
-
# package was created, all worked besides withPySide2, with which there
91
-
# was a peculiar segmentation fault during the tests. In anycase, PySide2
92
-
# shouldn't be used for modern applications.
93
88
withPyQt6 = plotpy.override {
94
89
pyqt6 = pyqt6;
95
90
qt6 = qt6;
96
91
};
97
-
withPySide6 = plotpy.override {
98
-
pyqt6 = pyside6;
99
-
qt6 = qt6;
100
-
};
101
92
withPyQt5 = plotpy.override {
102
93
pyqt6 = pyqt5;
103
94
qt6 = qt5;
104
95
};
96
+
};
97
+
# Upstream doesn't officially supports all of them, although they use
98
+
# qtpy, see: https://github.com/PlotPyStack/PlotPy/issues/20
99
+
knownFailingTests = {
100
+
# Was failing with a peculiar segmentation fault during the tests, since
101
+
# this package was added to Nixpkgs. This is not too bad as PySide2
102
+
# shouldn't be used for modern applications.
105
103
withPySide2 = plotpy.override {
106
104
pyqt6 = pyside2;
107
105
qt6 = qt5;
106
+
};
107
+
# Has started failing too similarly to pyside2, ever since a certain
108
+
# version bump. See also:
109
+
# https://github.com/PlotPyStack/PlotPy/blob/v2.7.4/README.md?plain=1#L62
110
+
withPySide6 = plotpy.override {
111
+
pyqt6 = pyside6;
112
+
qt6 = qt6;
108
113
};
109
114
};
110
115
};