openbsd-src/lib/libc/arch/i386/string/ at jcs · jcs.org/openbsd-src

jcs.org / openbsd-src

jcs's openbsd hax

openbsd

openbsd-src / lib / libc / arch / i386 / string /

at jcs 14 files

we do not need the complexity of an assembly swab function here. ok deraadt

11 years ago

Fix warnings about binding changed to STB_WEAK on i386

3 years ago

Fix warnings about binding changed to STB_WEAK on i386

3 years ago

Instead of trying to handle ffs() with the normal rename-mark-hidden-and-alias dance, mark it protected. This works better for both gcc and clang: gcc blocks overriding of internal calls, while clang permits inlining again.

8 years ago

clang doesn't propagate attributes like "asm labels" and "visibility(hidden)" to builtins like mem{set,cpy,move} and __stack_smash_handler. So, when building with clang, instead mark those as protected visibility to get rid of the PLT relocations. We can't take the address of them then, but that's ok: it's a build-time error not a run-time error.

8 years ago

clang doesn't propagate attributes like "asm labels" and "visibility(hidden)" to builtins like mem{set,cpy,move} and __stack_smash_handler. So, when building with clang, instead mark those as protected visibility to get rid of the PLT relocations. We can't take the address of them then, but that's ok: it's a build-time error not a run-time error.

8 years ago

Fix warnings about binding changed to STB_WEAK on i386

3 years ago

clang doesn't propagate attributes like "asm labels" and "visibility(hidden)" to builtins like mem{set,cpy,move} and __stack_smash_handler. So, when building with clang, instead mark those as protected visibility to get rid of the PLT relocations. We can't take the address of them then, but that's ok: it's a build-time error not a run-time error.

8 years ago

GNU ld has prefixed the contents of .gnu.warning.SYMBOL sections with "warning: " since 2003, so the messages themselves need not contain the prefix anymore.

8 years ago

clang doesn't propagate attributes like "asm labels" and "visibility(hidden)" to builtins like mem{set,cpy,move} and __stack_smash_handler. So, when building with clang, instead mark those as protected visibility to get rid of the PLT relocations. We can't take the address of them then, but that's ok: it's a build-time error not a run-time error.

8 years ago

clang doesn't propagate attributes like "asm labels" and "visibility(hidden)" to builtins like mem{set,cpy,move} and __stack_smash_handler. So, when building with clang, instead mark those as protected visibility to get rid of the PLT relocations. We can't take the address of them then, but that's ok: it's a build-time error not a run-time error.

8 years ago

GNU ld has prefixed the contents of .gnu.warning.SYMBOL sections with "warning: " since 2003, so the messages themselves need not contain the prefix anymore.

8 years ago

spelling fixes; from paul tagliamonte any changes not taken noted on tech, but chiefly here i did not take the cancelation - cancellation changes;

3 years ago

clang doesn't propagate attributes like "asm labels" and "visibility(hidden)" to builtins like mem{set,cpy,move} and __stack_smash_handler. So, when building with clang, instead mark those as protected visibility to get rid of the PLT relocations. We can't take the address of them then, but that's ok: it's a build-time error not a run-time error.

8 years ago