arm64: efi: Fix handling of misaligned runtime regions and drop warning

Currently, when mapping the EFI runtime regions in the EFI page tables,
we complain about misaligned regions in a rather noisy way, using
WARN().

Not only does this produce a lot of irrelevant clutter in the log, it is
factually incorrect, as misaligned runtime regions are actually allowed
by the EFI spec as long as they don't require conflicting memory types
within the same 64k page.

So let's drop the warning, and tweak the code so that we
- take both the start and end of the region into account when checking
for misalignment
- only revert to RWX mappings for non-code regions if misaligned code
regions are also known to exist.

Cc: <[e-mail]>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[e-mail]>

arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c

···
 
 #include <asm/efi.h>
 
+static bool region_is_misaligned(const efi_memory_desc_t *md)
+{
+	if (PAGE_SIZE == EFI_PAGE_SIZE)
+		return false;
+	return !PAGE_ALIGNED(md->phys_addr) ||
+	       !PAGE_ALIGNED(md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT);
+}
+
 /*
  * Only regions of type EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE need to be
  * executable, everything else can be mapped with the XN bits
···
 	if (type == EFI_MEMORY_MAPPED_IO)
 		return PROT_DEVICE_nGnRE;
 
-	if (WARN_ONCE(!PAGE_ALIGNED(md->phys_addr),
-		      "UEFI Runtime regions are not aligned to 64 KB -- buggy firmware?"))
+	if (region_is_misaligned(md)) {
+		static bool __initdata code_is_misaligned;
+
 		/*
-		 * If the region is not aligned to the page size of the OS, we
-		 * can not use strict permissions, since that would also affect
-		 * the mapping attributes of the adjacent regions.
+		 * Regions that are not aligned to the OS page size cannot be
+		 * mapped with strict permissions, as those might interfere
+		 * with the permissions that are needed by the adjacent
+		 * region's mapping. However, if we haven't encountered any
+		 * misaligned runtime code regions so far, we can safely use
+		 * non-executable permissions for non-code regions.
 		 */
-		return pgprot_val(PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC);
+		code_is_misaligned |= (type == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE);
+
+		return code_is_misaligned ? pgprot_val(PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC)
+					  : pgprot_val(PAGE_KERNEL);
+	}
 
 	/* R-- */
 	if ((attr & (EFI_MEMORY_XP | EFI_MEMORY_RO)) ==
···
 	bool page_mappings_only = (md->type == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE ||
 				   md->type == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA);
 
-	if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(md->phys_addr) ||
-	    !PAGE_ALIGNED(md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT)) {
-		/*
-		 * If the end address of this region is not aligned to page
-		 * size, the mapping is rounded up, and may end up sharing a
-		 * page frame with the next UEFI memory region. If we create
-		 * a block entry now, we may need to split it again when mapping
-		 * the next region, and support for that is going to be removed
-		 * from the MMU routines. So avoid block mappings altogether in
-		 * that case.
-		 */
+	/*
+	 * If this region is not aligned to the page size used by the OS, the
+	 * mapping will be rounded outwards, and may end up sharing a page
+	 * frame with an adjacent runtime memory region. Given that the page
+	 * table descriptor covering the shared page will be rewritten when the
+	 * adjacent region gets mapped, we must avoid block mappings here so we
+	 * don't have to worry about splitting them when that happens.
+	 */
+	if (region_is_misaligned(md))
 		page_mappings_only = true;
-	}
 
 	create_pgd_mapping(mm, md->phys_addr, md->virt_addr,
 			   md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT,
···
 {
 	BUG_ON(md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE &&
 	       md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA);
+
+	if (region_is_misaligned(md))
+		return 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Calling apply_to_page_range() is only safe on regions that are