Linux kernel mirror (for testing) git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
kernel os linux
1
fork

Configure Feed

Select the types of activity you want to include in your feed.

at v4.5 1386 lines 52 kB view raw
1 2Control Group v2 3 4October, 2015 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> 5 6This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and 7conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects 8of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All 9future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for 10v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/. 11 12CONTENTS 13 141. Introduction 15 1-1. Terminology 16 1-2. What is cgroup? 172. Basic Operations 18 2-1. Mounting 19 2-2. Organizing Processes 20 2-3. [Un]populated Notification 21 2-4. Controlling Controllers 22 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling 23 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint 24 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint 25 2-5. Delegation 26 2-5-1. Model of Delegation 27 2-5-2. Delegation Containment 28 2-6. Guidelines 29 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control 30 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions 313. Resource Distribution Models 32 3-1. Weights 33 3-2. Limits 34 3-3. Protections 35 3-4. Allocations 364. Interface Files 37 4-1. Format 38 4-2. Conventions 39 4-3. Core Interface Files 405. Controllers 41 5-1. CPU 42 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files 43 5-2. Memory 44 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files 45 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines 46 5-2-3. Memory Ownership 47 5-3. IO 48 5-3-1. IO Interface Files 49 5-3-2. Writeback 50P. Information on Kernel Programming 51 P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback 52D. Deprecated v1 Core Features 53R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2 54 R-1. Multiple Hierarchies 55 R-2. Thread Granularity 56 R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads 57 R-4. Other Interface Issues 58 R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies 59 R-5-1. Memory 60 61 621. Introduction 63 641-1. Terminology 65 66"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The 67singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a 68qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to 69multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used. 70 71 721-2. What is cgroup? 73 74cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and 75distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and 76configurable manner. 77 78cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers. 79cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing 80processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for 81distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy 82although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than 83resource distribution. 84 85cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs 86to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the 87same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that 88the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated 89to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already 90existing descendant processes. 91 92Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or 93disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are 94hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all 95processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive 96sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested 97cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The 98restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be 99overridden from further away. 100 101 1022. Basic Operations 103 1042-1. Mounting 105 106Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2 107hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command. 108 109 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT 110 111cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All 112controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are 113automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root. 114Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be 115bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the 116legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way. 117 118A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller 119is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup 120controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may 121have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on 122the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy. 123Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of 124the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled 125controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due 126to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be 127disabled too. 128 129While useful for development and manual configurations, moving 130controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is 131strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide 132the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the 133controllers after system boot. 134 135 1362-2. Organizing Processes 137 138Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong. 139A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory. 140 141 # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME 142 143A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree 144structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file 145"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which 146belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the 147same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to 148another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading. 149 150A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the 151target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated 152on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple 153threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the 154process. 155 156When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the 157cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the 158operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup 159that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a 160zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be 161moved to another cgroup. 162 163A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be 164destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't 165have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is 166considered empty and can be removed. 167 168 # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME 169 170"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy 171cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines, 172one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the 173format "0::$PATH". 174 175 # cat /proc/842/cgroup 176 ... 177 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested 178 179If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with 180is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path. 181 182 # cat /proc/842/cgroup 183 ... 184 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted) 185 186 1872-3. [Un]populated Notification 188 189Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains 190"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has 191live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in 192the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify 193events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for 194example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given 195sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and 196notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy 197where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes 198in each cgroup. 199 200 A(4) - B(0) - C(1) 201 \ D(0) 202 203A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one 204process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and 205file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of 206both cgroups. 207 208 2092-4. Controlling Controllers 210 2112-4-1. Enabling and Disabling 212 213Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all 214controllers available for the cgroup to enable. 215 216 # cat cgroup.controllers 217 cpu io memory 218 219No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and 220disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file. 221 222 # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control 223 224Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be 225enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they 226all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller 227are specified, the last one is effective. 228 229Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of 230the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled. 231Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are 232listed in parentheses. 233 234 A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C() 235 \ D() 236 237As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution 238of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has 239"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU 240cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled. 241 242As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to 243the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface 244files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B 245would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and 246D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory." 247prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the 248controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with 249"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself. 250 251 2522-4-2. Top-down Constraint 253 254Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute 255a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the 256parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files 257can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's 258"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if 259the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be 260disabled if one or more children have it enabled. 261 262 2632-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint 264 265Non-root cgroups can only distribute resources to their children when 266they don't have any processes of their own. In other words, only 267cgroups which don't contain any processes can have controllers enabled 268in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files. 269 270This guarantees that, when a controller is looking at the part of the 271hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on the 272leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete against 273internal processes of the parent. 274 275The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains 276processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated 277with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most 278controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed 279is up to each controller. 280 281Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no 282enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is 283important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a 284populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the 285cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the 286children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control" 287file. 288 289 2902-5. Delegation 291 2922-5-1. Model of Delegation 293 294A cgroup can be delegated to a less privileged user by granting write 295access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs" file to the user. Note 296that resource control interface files in a given directory control the 297distribution of the parent's resources and thus must not be delegated 298along with the directory. 299 300Once delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory, 301organize processes as it sees fit and further distribute the resources 302it received from the parent. The limits and other settings of all 303resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what happens 304in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the resource 305restrictions imposed by the parent. 306 307Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of 308cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however, 309this may be limited explicitly in the future. 310 311 3122-5-2. Delegation Containment 313 314A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes 315can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee. For 316a process with a non-root euid to migrate a target process into a 317cgroup by writing its PID to the "cgroup.procs" file, the following 318conditions must be met. 319 320- The writer's euid must match either uid or suid of the target process. 321 322- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file. 323 324- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the 325 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups. 326 327The above three constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate 328processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull 329in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy. 330 331For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to 332user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and 333all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0. 334 335 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00 336 ~ cgroup ~ \ C01 337 ~ hierarchy ~ 338 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10 339 340Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is 341currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the 342file and uid match on the process; however, the common ancestor of the 343source cgroup C10 and the destination cgroup C00 is above the points 344of delegation and U0 would not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" 345files and thus the write will be denied with -EACCES. 346 347 3482-6. Guidelines 349 3502-6-1. Organize Once and Control 351 352Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation 353and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the 354process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist 355inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms 356of synchronization cost. 357 358As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to 359apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload 360should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and 361resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource 362distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through 363the interface files. 364 365 3662-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions 367 368Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same 369directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide 370with interface files. 371 372All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each 373controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and 374a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and 375'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix 376character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't 377start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads 378such as job, service, slice, unit or workload. 379 380cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the 381user's responsibility to avoid them. 382 383 3843. Resource Distribution Models 385 386cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes 387depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section 388describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors. 389 390 3913-1. Weights 392 393A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all 394active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its 395weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the 396resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is 397work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually 398used for stateless resources. 399 400All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This 401allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine 402enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range. 403 404As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are 405valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or 406process migrations. 407 408"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children 409and is an example of this type. 410 411 4123-2. Limits 413 414A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource. 415Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can 416exceed the amount of resource available to the parent. 417 418Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop. 419 420As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are 421valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or 422process migrations. 423 424"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume 425on an IO device and is an example of this type. 426 427 4283-3. Protections 429 430A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of 431the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their 432protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort 433soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case 434only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among 435children. 436 437Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is 438noop. 439 440As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations 441are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or 442process migrations. 443 444"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an 445example of this type. 446 447 4483-4. Allocations 449 450A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite 451resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the 452allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource 453available to the parent. 454 455Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no 456resource. 457 458As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration 459combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the 460resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations 461may be rejected. 462 463"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this 464type. 465 466 4674. Interface Files 468 4694-1. Format 470 471All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever 472possible. 473 474 New-line separated values 475 (when only one value can be written at once) 476 477 VAL0\n 478 VAL1\n 479 ... 480 481 Space separated values 482 (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once) 483 484 VAL0 VAL1 ...\n 485 486 Flat keyed 487 488 KEY0 VAL0\n 489 KEY1 VAL1\n 490 ... 491 492 Nested keyed 493 494 KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01... 495 KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11... 496 ... 497 498For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match 499reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or 500implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases. 501 502For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key 503can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs 504may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified. 505 506 5074-2. Conventions 508 509- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file. 510 511- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus 512 shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also, 513 informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global 514 information available elsewhere shouldn't exist. 515 516- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its 517 interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1, 518 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow 519 enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it 520 intuitive (the default is 100%). 521 522- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or 523 limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max" 524 respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource 525 guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low" 526 and "high" respectively. 527 528 In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be 529 used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing. 530 531- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific 532 overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and 533 appear as the first entry in the file. 534 535 The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or 536 "$VAL". 537 538 When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as 539 the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries 540 with "default" as the value must not appear when read. 541 542 For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers 543 with integer values may look like the following. 544 545 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file 546 default 150 547 8:0 300 548 549 The default value can be updated by 550 551 # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file 552 553 or 554 555 # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file 556 557 An override can be set by 558 559 # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file 560 561 and cleared by 562 563 # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file 564 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file 565 default 125 566 8:16 170 567 568- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file 569 "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs. 570 Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be 571 generated on the file. 572 573 5744-3. Core Interface Files 575 576All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup." 577 578 cgroup.procs 579 580 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on 581 all cgroups. 582 583 When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to 584 the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the 585 same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved 586 to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while 587 reading. 588 589 A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with 590 the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the 591 following conditions. 592 593 - Its euid is either root or must match either uid or suid of 594 the target process. 595 596 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file. 597 598 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the 599 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups. 600 601 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file 602 should be granted along with the containing directory. 603 604 cgroup.controllers 605 606 A read-only space separated values file which exists on all 607 cgroups. 608 609 It shows space separated list of all controllers available to 610 the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered. 611 612 cgroup.subtree_control 613 614 A read-write space separated values file which exists on all 615 cgroups. Starts out empty. 616 617 When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers 618 which are enabled to control resource distribution from the 619 cgroup to its children. 620 621 Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-' 622 can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller 623 name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-' 624 disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list, 625 the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable 626 operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail. 627 628 cgroup.events 629 630 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. 631 The following entries are defined. Unless specified 632 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file 633 modified event. 634 635 populated 636 637 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live 638 processes; otherwise, 0. 639 640 6415. Controllers 642 6435-1. CPU 644 645[NOTE: The interface for the cpu controller hasn't been merged yet] 646 647The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This 648controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for 649normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for 650realtime scheduling policy. 651 652 6535-1-1. CPU Interface Files 654 655All time durations are in microseconds. 656 657 cpu.stat 658 659 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. 660 661 It reports the following six stats. 662 663 usage_usec 664 user_usec 665 system_usec 666 nr_periods 667 nr_throttled 668 throttled_usec 669 670 cpu.weight 671 672 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root 673 cgroups. The default is "100". 674 675 The weight in the range [1, 10000]. 676 677 cpu.max 678 679 A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups. 680 The default is "max 100000". 681 682 The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format. 683 684 $MAX $PERIOD 685 686 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each 687 $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only 688 one number is written, $MAX is updated. 689 690 cpu.rt.max 691 692 [NOTE: The semantics of this file is still under discussion and the 693 interface hasn't been merged yet] 694 695 A read-write two value file which exists on all cgroups. 696 The default is "0 100000". 697 698 The maximum realtime runtime allocation. Over-committing 699 configurations are disallowed and process migrations are 700 rejected if not enough bandwidth is available. It's in the 701 following format. 702 703 $MAX $PERIOD 704 705 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each 706 $PERIOD duration. If only one number is written, $MAX is 707 updated. 708 709 7105-2. Memory 711 712The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is 713stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the 714intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the 715stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively 716complex. 717 718While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given 719cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be 720accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the 721following types of memory usages are tracked. 722 723- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory. 724 725- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes. 726 727- TCP socket buffers. 728 729The above list may expand in the future for better coverage. 730 731 7325-2-1. Memory Interface Files 733 734All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to 735PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest 736PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back. 737 738 memory.current 739 740 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root 741 cgroups. 742 743 The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup 744 and its descendants. 745 746 memory.low 747 748 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root 749 cgroups. The default is "0". 750 751 Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usages of a 752 cgroup and all its ancestors are below their low boundaries, 753 the cgroup's memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be 754 reclaimed from unprotected cgroups. 755 756 Putting more memory than generally available under this 757 protection is discouraged. 758 759 memory.high 760 761 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root 762 cgroups. The default is "max". 763 764 Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to 765 control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes 766 over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are 767 throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure. 768 769 Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and 770 under extreme conditions the limit may be breached. 771 772 memory.max 773 774 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root 775 cgroups. The default is "max". 776 777 Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection 778 mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and 779 can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup. 780 Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit 781 temporarily. 782 783 This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the 784 high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's 785 utility is limited to providing the final safety net. 786 787 memory.events 788 789 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. 790 The following entries are defined. Unless specified 791 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file 792 modified event. 793 794 low 795 796 The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to 797 high memory pressure even though its usage is under 798 the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low 799 boundary is over-committed. 800 801 high 802 803 The number of times processes of the cgroup are 804 throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim 805 because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a 806 cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit 807 rather than global memory pressure, this event's 808 occurrences are expected. 809 810 max 811 812 The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was 813 about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim 814 fails to bring it down, the OOM killer is invoked. 815 816 oom 817 818 The number of times the OOM killer has been invoked in 819 the cgroup. This may not exactly match the number of 820 processes killed but should generally be close. 821 822 memory.stat 823 824 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. 825 826 This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different 827 types of memory, type-specific details, and other information 828 on the state and past events of the memory management system. 829 830 All memory amounts are in bytes. 831 832 The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries 833 can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a 834 fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values! 835 836 anon 837 838 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as 839 brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS) 840 841 file 842 843 Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data, 844 including tmpfs and shared memory. 845 846 sock 847 848 Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers 849 850 file_mapped 851 852 Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap() 853 854 file_dirty 855 856 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but 857 not yet written back to disk 858 859 file_writeback 860 861 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and 862 is currently being written back to disk 863 864 inactive_anon 865 active_anon 866 inactive_file 867 active_file 868 unevictable 869 870 Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed, 871 on the internal memory management lists used by the 872 page reclaim algorithm 873 874 pgfault 875 876 Total number of page faults incurred 877 878 pgmajfault 879 880 Number of major page faults incurred 881 882 memory.swap.current 883 884 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root 885 cgroups. 886 887 The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup 888 and its descendants. 889 890 memory.swap.max 891 892 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root 893 cgroups. The default is "max". 894 895 Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this 896 limit, anonymous meomry of the cgroup will not be swapped out. 897 898 8995-2-2. General Usage 900 901"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage. 902Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory) 903and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to 904usage is a viable strategy. 905 906Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but 907throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample 908opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting 909more memory or terminating the workload. 910 911Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as 912memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from 913more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from 914network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as 915performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory 916pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of 917memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more 918memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't 919implemented yet. 920 921 9225-2-3. Memory Ownership 923 924A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays 925charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process 926to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it 927instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup. 928 929A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups. 930To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however, 931over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has 932enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure. 933 934If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected 935to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use 936POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas 937belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership. 938 939 9405-3. IO 941 942The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This 943controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS 944limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available 945only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for 946blk-mq devices. 947 948 9495-3-1. IO Interface Files 950 951 io.stat 952 953 A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root 954 cgroups. 955 956 Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. 957 The following nested keys are defined. 958 959 rbytes Bytes read 960 wbytes Bytes written 961 rios Number of read IOs 962 wios Number of write IOs 963 964 An example read output follows. 965 966 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353 967 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252 968 969 io.weight 970 971 A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. 972 The default is "default 100". 973 974 The first line is the default weight applied to devices 975 without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by 976 $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in 977 the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time 978 the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings. 979 980 The default weight can be updated by writing either "default 981 $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing 982 "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default". 983 984 An example read output follows. 985 986 default 100 987 8:16 200 988 8:0 50 989 990 io.max 991 992 A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root 993 cgroups. 994 995 BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN 996 device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are 997 defined. 998 999 rbps Max read bytes per second 1000 wbps Max write bytes per second 1001 riops Max read IO operations per second 1002 wiops Max write IO operations per second 1003 1004 When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be 1005 specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value 1006 to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified 1007 multiple times, the outcome is undefined. 1008 1009 BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are 1010 delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed. 1011 1012 Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16. 1013 1014 echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max 1015 1016 Reading returns the following. 1017 1018 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120 1019 1020 Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following. 1021 1022 echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max 1023 1024 Reading now returns the following. 1025 1026 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max 1027 1028 10295-3-2. Writeback 1030 1031Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and 1032written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback 1033mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and 1034regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and 1035write IOs. 1036 1037The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller, 1038implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller 1039defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and 1040maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which 1041writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and 1042per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive 1043of the two is enforced. 1044 1045cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying 1046filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4 1047and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to 1048the root cgroup. 1049 1050There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management 1051which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per 1052page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an 1053inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages 1054from the inode are attributed to that cgroup. 1055 1056As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages 1057which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is 1058associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback 1059constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign 1060cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches 1061the ownership of the inode to that cgroup. 1062 1063While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is 1064mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup 1065changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single 1066inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a 1067significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly. 1068As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and 1069doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback 1070strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping 1071areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage 1072patterns. 1073 1074The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup 1075writeback as follows. 1076 1077 vm.dirty_background_ratio 1078 vm.dirty_ratio 1079 1080 These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the 1081 amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the 1082 memory controller and system-wide clean memory. 1083 1084 vm.dirty_background_bytes 1085 vm.dirty_bytes 1086 1087 For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against 1088 total available memory and applied the same way as 1089 vm.dirty[_background]_ratio. 1090 1091 1092P. Information on Kernel Programming 1093 1094This section contains kernel programming information in the areas 1095where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and 1096controllers are not covered. 1097 1098 1099P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback 1100 1101A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating 1102address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the 1103following two functions. 1104 1105 wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio) 1106 1107 Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and 1108 associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup. Can be 1109 called anytime between bio allocation and submission. 1110 1111 wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes) 1112 1113 Should be called for each data segment being written out. 1114 While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called 1115 during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most 1116 natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio. 1117 1118With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per 1119super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for 1120selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when 1121certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are 1122incompatible. 1123 1124wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on 1125the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if 1126the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal 1127entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution 1128for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem 1129cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg() 1130directly. 1131 1132 1133D. Deprecated v1 Core Features 1134 1135- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported. 1136 1137- All mount options and remounting are not supported. 1138 1139- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted. 1140 1141- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed. 1142 1143- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file 1144 at the root instead. 1145 1146 1147R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2 1148 1149R-1. Multiple Hierarchies 1150 1151cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each 1152hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to 1153provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice. 1154 1155For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility 1156type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all 1157hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by 1158the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once 1159hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers 1160bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the 1161hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on 1162the specific controller. 1163 1164In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be 1165put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting 1166each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such 1167as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same 1168hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple 1169similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy 1170whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary. 1171 1172Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost. 1173It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly 1174the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be 1175used in general and what controllers was able to do. 1176 1177There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant 1178that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite 1179length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited 1180in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to 1181addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership, 1182which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number 1183of hierarchies. 1184 1185Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the 1186topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each 1187controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to 1188completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at 1189least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other. 1190 1191In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are 1192completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is 1193called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity 1194depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may 1195be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific 1196controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about 1197how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting 1198to control how CPU cycles are distributed. 1199 1200 1201R-2. Thread Granularity 1202 1203cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups. 1204This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers 1205ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but 1206much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to 1207individual applications and system management interface. 1208 1209Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process 1210itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes, 1211categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from 1212the application which owns the target process. 1213 1214cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused 1215in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to 1216individual applications so that they can create and manage their own 1217sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This 1218effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed 1219to lay programs. 1220 1221First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be 1222exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to 1223extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup, 1224construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open 1225and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky 1226and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to 1227define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee 1228that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy. 1229 1230cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be 1231accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to 1232system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface 1233knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly 1234revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to 1235individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism 1236effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs 1237without going through the required scrutiny. 1238 1239This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with 1240misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and 1241locked into constructs inadvertently. 1242 1243 1244R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads 1245 1246cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an 1247interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its 1248children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two 1249different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to 1250settle it. Different controllers did different things. 1251 1252The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and 1253mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but 1254fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU 1255cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios 1256constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated. 1257There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight 1258wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which 1259simply weren't available for threads. 1260 1261The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each 1262cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all 1263the knobs with "leaf_" prefixed. While this allowed equivalent 1264control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It 1265always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary 1266otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the 1267implementation. 1268 1269The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened 1270between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not 1271clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and 1272knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have 1273led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term. 1274 1275Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with 1276different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were 1277severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors 1278made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent. 1279 1280This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core 1281in a uniform way. 1282 1283 1284R-4. Other Interface Issues 1285 1286cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of 1287idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side 1288was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was 1289forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't 1290recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led 1291to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating 1292the interface. 1293 1294Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is 1295controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating 1296all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root 1297cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent 1298implementation details to userland. 1299 1300There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup 1301was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra 1302restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until 1303explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of 1304control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics 1305and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different 1306formats and units even in the same controller. 1307 1308cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates 1309controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces. 1310 1311 1312R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies 1313 1314R-5-1. Memory 1315 1316The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit 1317that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that 1318global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for 1319optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the 1320implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the 1321basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no 1322hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global 1323rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located 1324in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second, 1325the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just 1326introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts 1327system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature 1328becomes self-defeating. 1329 1330The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated 1331reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its 1332ancestors are below their low boundaries, which makes delegation of 1333subtrees possible. Secondly, new cgroups have no reserve per default 1334and in the common case most cgroups are eligible for the preferred 1335reclaim pass. This allows the new low boundary to be efficiently 1336implemented with just a minor addition to the generic reclaim code, 1337without the need for out-of-band data structures and reclaim passes. 1338Because the generic reclaim code considers all cgroups except for the 1339ones running low in the preferred first reclaim pass, overreclaim of 1340individual groups is eliminated as well, resulting in much better 1341overall workload performance. 1342 1343The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict 1344limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called. 1345But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the 1346available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during 1347runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a 1348strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the 1349working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size 1350estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in 1351OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and 1352end up wasting precious resources. 1353 1354The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more 1355conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them 1356into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the 1357OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too 1358aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will 1359lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this 1360and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still 1361gives acceptable performance is found. 1362 1363In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete 1364breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can 1365be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the 1366allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the 1367system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to 1368limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even 1369malicious applications. 1370 1371The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real 1372control over swap space. 1373 1374The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original 1375cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be 1376able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the 1377child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted 1378groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its 1379anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full 1380swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs. 1381 1382For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an 1383intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea 1384that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical 1385resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system, 1386and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.