Linux kernel mirror (for testing) git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
kernel os linux
1
fork

Configure Feed

Select the types of activity you want to include in your feed.

at v2.6.31 414 lines 16 kB view raw
1Memory Resource Controller 2 3NOTE: The Memory Resource Controller has been generically been referred 4to as the memory controller in this document. Do not confuse memory controller 5used here with the memory controller that is used in hardware. 6 7Salient features 8 9a. Enable control of Anonymous, Page Cache (mapped and unmapped) and 10 Swap Cache memory pages. 11b. The infrastructure allows easy addition of other types of memory to control 12c. Provides *zero overhead* for non memory controller users 13d. Provides a double LRU: global memory pressure causes reclaim from the 14 global LRU; a cgroup on hitting a limit, reclaims from the per 15 cgroup LRU 16 17Benefits and Purpose of the memory controller 18 19The memory controller isolates the memory behaviour of a group of tasks 20from the rest of the system. The article on LWN [12] mentions some probable 21uses of the memory controller. The memory controller can be used to 22 23a. Isolate an application or a group of applications 24 Memory hungry applications can be isolated and limited to a smaller 25 amount of memory. 26b. Create a cgroup with limited amount of memory, this can be used 27 as a good alternative to booting with mem=XXXX. 28c. Virtualization solutions can control the amount of memory they want 29 to assign to a virtual machine instance. 30d. A CD/DVD burner could control the amount of memory used by the 31 rest of the system to ensure that burning does not fail due to lack 32 of available memory. 33e. There are several other use cases, find one or use the controller just 34 for fun (to learn and hack on the VM subsystem). 35 361. History 37 38The memory controller has a long history. A request for comments for the memory 39controller was posted by Balbir Singh [1]. At the time the RFC was posted 40there were several implementations for memory control. The goal of the 41RFC was to build consensus and agreement for the minimal features required 42for memory control. The first RSS controller was posted by Balbir Singh[2] 43in Feb 2007. Pavel Emelianov [3][4][5] has since posted three versions of the 44RSS controller. At OLS, at the resource management BoF, everyone suggested 45that we handle both page cache and RSS together. Another request was raised 46to allow user space handling of OOM. The current memory controller is 47at version 6; it combines both mapped (RSS) and unmapped Page 48Cache Control [11]. 49 502. Memory Control 51 52Memory is a unique resource in the sense that it is present in a limited 53amount. If a task requires a lot of CPU processing, the task can spread 54its processing over a period of hours, days, months or years, but with 55memory, the same physical memory needs to be reused to accomplish the task. 56 57The memory controller implementation has been divided into phases. These 58are: 59 601. Memory controller 612. mlock(2) controller 623. Kernel user memory accounting and slab control 634. user mappings length controller 64 65The memory controller is the first controller developed. 66 672.1. Design 68 69The core of the design is a counter called the res_counter. The res_counter 70tracks the current memory usage and limit of the group of processes associated 71with the controller. Each cgroup has a memory controller specific data 72structure (mem_cgroup) associated with it. 73 742.2. Accounting 75 76 +--------------------+ 77 | mem_cgroup | 78 | (res_counter) | 79 +--------------------+ 80 / ^ \ 81 / | \ 82 +---------------+ | +---------------+ 83 | mm_struct | |.... | mm_struct | 84 | | | | | 85 +---------------+ | +---------------+ 86 | 87 + --------------+ 88 | 89 +---------------+ +------+--------+ 90 | page +----------> page_cgroup| 91 | | | | 92 +---------------+ +---------------+ 93 94 (Figure 1: Hierarchy of Accounting) 95 96 97Figure 1 shows the important aspects of the controller 98 991. Accounting happens per cgroup 1002. Each mm_struct knows about which cgroup it belongs to 1013. Each page has a pointer to the page_cgroup, which in turn knows the 102 cgroup it belongs to 103 104The accounting is done as follows: mem_cgroup_charge() is invoked to setup 105the necessary data structures and check if the cgroup that is being charged 106is over its limit. If it is then reclaim is invoked on the cgroup. 107More details can be found in the reclaim section of this document. 108If everything goes well, a page meta-data-structure called page_cgroup is 109allocated and associated with the page. This routine also adds the page to 110the per cgroup LRU. 111 1122.2.1 Accounting details 113 114All mapped anon pages (RSS) and cache pages (Page Cache) are accounted. 115(some pages which never be reclaimable and will not be on global LRU 116 are not accounted. we just accounts pages under usual vm management.) 117 118RSS pages are accounted at page_fault unless they've already been accounted 119for earlier. A file page will be accounted for as Page Cache when it's 120inserted into inode (radix-tree). While it's mapped into the page tables of 121processes, duplicate accounting is carefully avoided. 122 123A RSS page is unaccounted when it's fully unmapped. A PageCache page is 124unaccounted when it's removed from radix-tree. 125 126At page migration, accounting information is kept. 127 128Note: we just account pages-on-lru because our purpose is to control amount 129of used pages. not-on-lru pages are tend to be out-of-control from vm view. 130 1312.3 Shared Page Accounting 132 133Shared pages are accounted on the basis of the first touch approach. The 134cgroup that first touches a page is accounted for the page. The principle 135behind this approach is that a cgroup that aggressively uses a shared 136page will eventually get charged for it (once it is uncharged from 137the cgroup that brought it in -- this will happen on memory pressure). 138 139Exception: If CONFIG_CGROUP_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP is not used.. 140When you do swapoff and make swapped-out pages of shmem(tmpfs) to 141be backed into memory in force, charges for pages are accounted against the 142caller of swapoff rather than the users of shmem. 143 144 1452.4 Swap Extension (CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP) 146Swap Extension allows you to record charge for swap. A swapped-in page is 147charged back to original page allocator if possible. 148 149When swap is accounted, following files are added. 150 - memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes. 151 - memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes. 152 153usage of mem+swap is limited by memsw.limit_in_bytes. 154 155* why 'mem+swap' rather than swap. 156The global LRU(kswapd) can swap out arbitrary pages. Swap-out means 157to move account from memory to swap...there is no change in usage of 158mem+swap. In other words, when we want to limit the usage of swap without 159affecting global LRU, mem+swap limit is better than just limiting swap from 160OS point of view. 161 162* What happens when a cgroup hits memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes 163When a cgroup his memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes, it's useless to do swap-out 164in this cgroup. Then, swap-out will not be done by cgroup routine and file 165caches are dropped. But as mentioned above, global LRU can do swapout memory 166from it for sanity of the system's memory management state. You can't forbid 167it by cgroup. 168 1692.5 Reclaim 170 171Each cgroup maintains a per cgroup LRU that consists of an active 172and inactive list. When a cgroup goes over its limit, we first try 173to reclaim memory from the cgroup so as to make space for the new 174pages that the cgroup has touched. If the reclaim is unsuccessful, 175an OOM routine is invoked to select and kill the bulkiest task in the 176cgroup. 177 178The reclaim algorithm has not been modified for cgroups, except that 179pages that are selected for reclaiming come from the per cgroup LRU 180list. 181 1822. Locking 183 184The memory controller uses the following hierarchy 185 1861. zone->lru_lock is used for selecting pages to be isolated 1872. mem->per_zone->lru_lock protects the per cgroup LRU (per zone) 1883. lock_page_cgroup() is used to protect page->page_cgroup 189 1903. User Interface 191 1920. Configuration 193 194a. Enable CONFIG_CGROUPS 195b. Enable CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS 196c. Enable CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR 197 1981. Prepare the cgroups 199# mkdir -p /cgroups 200# mount -t cgroup none /cgroups -o memory 201 2022. Make the new group and move bash into it 203# mkdir /cgroups/0 204# echo $$ > /cgroups/0/tasks 205 206Since now we're in the 0 cgroup, 207We can alter the memory limit: 208# echo 4M > /cgroups/0/memory.limit_in_bytes 209 210NOTE: We can use a suffix (k, K, m, M, g or G) to indicate values in kilo, 211mega or gigabytes. 212NOTE: We can write "-1" to reset the *.limit_in_bytes(unlimited). 213 214# cat /cgroups/0/memory.limit_in_bytes 2154194304 216 217NOTE: The interface has now changed to display the usage in bytes 218instead of pages 219 220We can check the usage: 221# cat /cgroups/0/memory.usage_in_bytes 2221216512 223 224A successful write to this file does not guarantee a successful set of 225this limit to the value written into the file. This can be due to a 226number of factors, such as rounding up to page boundaries or the total 227availability of memory on the system. The user is required to re-read 228this file after a write to guarantee the value committed by the kernel. 229 230# echo 1 > memory.limit_in_bytes 231# cat memory.limit_in_bytes 2324096 233 234The memory.failcnt field gives the number of times that the cgroup limit was 235exceeded. 236 237The memory.stat file gives accounting information. Now, the number of 238caches, RSS and Active pages/Inactive pages are shown. 239 2404. Testing 241 242Balbir posted lmbench, AIM9, LTP and vmmstress results [10] and [11]. 243Apart from that v6 has been tested with several applications and regular 244daily use. The controller has also been tested on the PPC64, x86_64 and 245UML platforms. 246 2474.1 Troubleshooting 248 249Sometimes a user might find that the application under a cgroup is 250terminated. There are several causes for this: 251 2521. The cgroup limit is too low (just too low to do anything useful) 2532. The user is using anonymous memory and swap is turned off or too low 254 255A sync followed by echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches will help get rid of 256some of the pages cached in the cgroup (page cache pages). 257 2584.2 Task migration 259 260When a task migrates from one cgroup to another, it's charge is not 261carried forward. The pages allocated from the original cgroup still 262remain charged to it, the charge is dropped when the page is freed or 263reclaimed. 264 2654.3 Removing a cgroup 266 267A cgroup can be removed by rmdir, but as discussed in sections 4.1 and 4.2, a 268cgroup might have some charge associated with it, even though all 269tasks have migrated away from it. 270Such charges are freed(at default) or moved to its parent. When moved, 271both of RSS and CACHES are moved to parent. 272If both of them are busy, rmdir() returns -EBUSY. See 5.1 Also. 273 274Charges recorded in swap information is not updated at removal of cgroup. 275Recorded information is discarded and a cgroup which uses swap (swapcache) 276will be charged as a new owner of it. 277 278 2795. Misc. interfaces. 280 2815.1 force_empty 282 memory.force_empty interface is provided to make cgroup's memory usage empty. 283 You can use this interface only when the cgroup has no tasks. 284 When writing anything to this 285 286 # echo 0 > memory.force_empty 287 288 Almost all pages tracked by this memcg will be unmapped and freed. Some of 289 pages cannot be freed because it's locked or in-use. Such pages are moved 290 to parent and this cgroup will be empty. But this may return -EBUSY in 291 some too busy case. 292 293 Typical use case of this interface is that calling this before rmdir(). 294 Because rmdir() moves all pages to parent, some out-of-use page caches can be 295 moved to the parent. If you want to avoid that, force_empty will be useful. 296 2975.2 stat file 298 299memory.stat file includes following statistics 300 301cache - # of bytes of page cache memory. 302rss - # of bytes of anonymous and swap cache memory. 303pgpgin - # of pages paged in (equivalent to # of charging events). 304pgpgout - # of pages paged out (equivalent to # of uncharging events). 305active_anon - # of bytes of anonymous and swap cache memory on active 306 lru list. 307inactive_anon - # of bytes of anonymous memory and swap cache memory on 308 inactive lru list. 309active_file - # of bytes of file-backed memory on active lru list. 310inactive_file - # of bytes of file-backed memory on inactive lru list. 311unevictable - # of bytes of memory that cannot be reclaimed (mlocked etc). 312 313The following additional stats are dependent on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM. 314 315inactive_ratio - VM internal parameter. (see mm/page_alloc.c) 316recent_rotated_anon - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c) 317recent_rotated_file - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c) 318recent_scanned_anon - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c) 319recent_scanned_file - VM internal parameter. (see mm/vmscan.c) 320 321Memo: 322 recent_rotated means recent frequency of lru rotation. 323 recent_scanned means recent # of scans to lru. 324 showing for better debug please see the code for meanings. 325 326Note: 327 Only anonymous and swap cache memory is listed as part of 'rss' stat. 328 This should not be confused with the true 'resident set size' or the 329 amount of physical memory used by the cgroup. Per-cgroup rss 330 accounting is not done yet. 331 3325.3 swappiness 333 Similar to /proc/sys/vm/swappiness, but affecting a hierarchy of groups only. 334 335 Following cgroups' swapiness can't be changed. 336 - root cgroup (uses /proc/sys/vm/swappiness). 337 - a cgroup which uses hierarchy and it has child cgroup. 338 - a cgroup which uses hierarchy and not the root of hierarchy. 339 340 3416. Hierarchy support 342 343The memory controller supports a deep hierarchy and hierarchical accounting. 344The hierarchy is created by creating the appropriate cgroups in the 345cgroup filesystem. Consider for example, the following cgroup filesystem 346hierarchy 347 348 root 349 / | \ 350 / | \ 351 a b c 352 | \ 353 | \ 354 d e 355 356In the diagram above, with hierarchical accounting enabled, all memory 357usage of e, is accounted to its ancestors up until the root (i.e, c and root), 358that has memory.use_hierarchy enabled. If one of the ancestors goes over its 359limit, the reclaim algorithm reclaims from the tasks in the ancestor and the 360children of the ancestor. 361 3626.1 Enabling hierarchical accounting and reclaim 363 364The memory controller by default disables the hierarchy feature. Support 365can be enabled by writing 1 to memory.use_hierarchy file of the root cgroup 366 367# echo 1 > memory.use_hierarchy 368 369The feature can be disabled by 370 371# echo 0 > memory.use_hierarchy 372 373NOTE1: Enabling/disabling will fail if the cgroup already has other 374cgroups created below it. 375 376NOTE2: This feature can be enabled/disabled per subtree. 377 3787. TODO 379 3801. Add support for accounting huge pages (as a separate controller) 3812. Make per-cgroup scanner reclaim not-shared pages first 3823. Teach controller to account for shared-pages 3834. Start reclamation in the background when the limit is 384 not yet hit but the usage is getting closer 385 386Summary 387 388Overall, the memory controller has been a stable controller and has been 389commented and discussed quite extensively in the community. 390 391References 392 3931. Singh, Balbir. RFC: Memory Controller, http://lwn.net/Articles/206697/ 3942. Singh, Balbir. Memory Controller (RSS Control), 395 http://lwn.net/Articles/222762/ 3963. Emelianov, Pavel. Resource controllers based on process cgroups 397 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/6/198 3984. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v2) 399 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/9/78 4005. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v3) 401 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/30/244 4026. Menage, Paul. Control Groups v10, http://lwn.net/Articles/236032/ 4037. Vaidyanathan, Srinivasan, Control Groups: Pagecache accounting and control 404 subsystem (v3), http://lwn.net/Articles/235534/ 4058. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 test results (lmbench), 406 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/17/232 4079. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 AIM9 results 408 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/18/1 40910. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller v6 test results, 410 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/19/36 41111. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller introduction (v6), 412 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/17/69 41312. Corbet, Jonathan, Controlling memory use in cgroups, 414 http://lwn.net/Articles/243795/