Linux kernel mirror (for testing) git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
kernel os linux
fork

Configure Feed

Select the types of activity you want to include in your feed.

at v2.6.29 172 lines 7.3 kB view raw
1/* 2 * SpanDSP - a series of DSP components for telephony 3 * 4 * echo.c - A line echo canceller. This code is being developed 5 * against and partially complies with G168. 6 * 7 * Written by Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org> 8 * and David Rowe <david_at_rowetel_dot_com> 9 * 10 * Copyright (C) 2001 Steve Underwood and 2007 David Rowe 11 * 12 * All rights reserved. 13 * 14 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify 15 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2, as 16 * published by the Free Software Foundation. 17 * 18 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, 19 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of 20 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the 21 * GNU General Public License for more details. 22 * 23 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License 24 * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software 25 * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. 26 * 27 * $Id: echo.h,v 1.9 2006/10/24 13:45:28 steveu Exp $ 28 */ 29 30#ifndef __ECHO_H 31#define __ECHO_H 32 33/*! \page echo_can_page Line echo cancellation for voice 34 35\section echo_can_page_sec_1 What does it do? 36This module aims to provide G.168-2002 compliant echo cancellation, to remove 37electrical echoes (e.g. from 2-4 wire hybrids) from voice calls. 38 39\section echo_can_page_sec_2 How does it work? 40The heart of the echo cancellor is FIR filter. This is adapted to match the 41echo impulse response of the telephone line. It must be long enough to 42adequately cover the duration of that impulse response. The signal transmitted 43to the telephone line is passed through the FIR filter. Once the FIR is 44properly adapted, the resulting output is an estimate of the echo signal 45received from the line. This is subtracted from the received signal. The result 46is an estimate of the signal which originated at the far end of the line, free 47from echos of our own transmitted signal. 48 49The least mean squares (LMS) algorithm is attributed to Widrow and Hoff, and 50was introduced in 1960. It is the commonest form of filter adaption used in 51things like modem line equalisers and line echo cancellers. There it works very 52well. However, it only works well for signals of constant amplitude. It works 53very poorly for things like speech echo cancellation, where the signal level 54varies widely. This is quite easy to fix. If the signal level is normalised - 55similar to applying AGC - LMS can work as well for a signal of varying 56amplitude as it does for a modem signal. This normalised least mean squares 57(NLMS) algorithm is the commonest one used for speech echo cancellation. Many 58other algorithms exist - e.g. RLS (essentially the same as Kalman filtering), 59FAP, etc. Some perform significantly better than NLMS. However, factors such 60as computational complexity and patents favour the use of NLMS. 61 62A simple refinement to NLMS can improve its performance with speech. NLMS tends 63to adapt best to the strongest parts of a signal. If the signal is white noise, 64the NLMS algorithm works very well. However, speech has more low frequency than 65high frequency content. Pre-whitening (i.e. filtering the signal to flatten its 66spectrum) the echo signal improves the adapt rate for speech, and ensures the 67final residual signal is not heavily biased towards high frequencies. A very 68low complexity filter is adequate for this, so pre-whitening adds little to the 69compute requirements of the echo canceller. 70 71An FIR filter adapted using pre-whitened NLMS performs well, provided certain 72conditions are met: 73 74 - The transmitted signal has poor self-correlation. 75 - There is no signal being generated within the environment being 76 cancelled. 77 78The difficulty is that neither of these can be guaranteed. 79 80If the adaption is performed while transmitting noise (or something fairly 81noise like, such as voice) the adaption works very well. If the adaption is 82performed while transmitting something highly correlative (typically narrow 83band energy such as signalling tones or DTMF), the adaption can go seriously 84wrong. The reason is there is only one solution for the adaption on a near 85random signal - the impulse response of the line. For a repetitive signal, 86there are any number of solutions which converge the adaption, and nothing 87guides the adaption to choose the generalised one. Allowing an untrained 88canceller to converge on this kind of narrowband energy probably a good thing, 89since at least it cancels the tones. Allowing a well converged canceller to 90continue converging on such energy is just a way to ruin its generalised 91adaption. A narrowband detector is needed, so adapation can be suspended at 92appropriate times. 93 94The adaption process is based on trying to eliminate the received signal. When 95there is any signal from within the environment being cancelled it may upset 96the adaption process. Similarly, if the signal we are transmitting is small, 97noise may dominate and disturb the adaption process. If we can ensure that the 98adaption is only performed when we are transmitting a significant signal level, 99and the environment is not, things will be OK. Clearly, it is easy to tell when 100we are sending a significant signal. Telling, if the environment is generating 101a significant signal, and doing it with sufficient speed that the adaption will 102not have diverged too much more we stop it, is a little harder. 103 104The key problem in detecting when the environment is sourcing significant 105energy is that we must do this very quickly. Given a reasonably long sample of 106the received signal, there are a number of strategies which may be used to 107assess whether that signal contains a strong far end component. However, by the 108time that assessment is complete the far end signal will have already caused 109major mis-convergence in the adaption process. An assessment algorithm is 110needed which produces a fairly accurate result from a very short burst of far 111end energy. 112 113\section echo_can_page_sec_3 How do I use it? 114The echo cancellor processes both the transmit and receive streams sample by 115sample. The processing function is not declared inline. Unfortunately, 116cancellation requires many operations per sample, so the call overhead is only 117a minor burden. 118*/ 119 120#include "fir.h" 121#include "oslec.h" 122 123/*! 124 G.168 echo canceller descriptor. This defines the working state for a line 125 echo canceller. 126*/ 127struct oslec_state { 128 int16_t tx, rx; 129 int16_t clean; 130 int16_t clean_nlp; 131 132 int nonupdate_dwell; 133 int curr_pos; 134 int taps; 135 int log2taps; 136 int adaption_mode; 137 138 int cond_met; 139 int32_t Pstates; 140 int16_t adapt; 141 int32_t factor; 142 int16_t shift; 143 144 /* Average levels and averaging filter states */ 145 int Ltxacc, Lrxacc, Lcleanacc, Lclean_bgacc; 146 int Ltx, Lrx; 147 int Lclean; 148 int Lclean_bg; 149 int Lbgn, Lbgn_acc, Lbgn_upper, Lbgn_upper_acc; 150 151 /* foreground and background filter states */ 152 struct fir16_state_t fir_state; 153 struct fir16_state_t fir_state_bg; 154 int16_t *fir_taps16[2]; 155 156 /* DC blocking filter states */ 157 int tx_1, tx_2, rx_1, rx_2; 158 159 /* optional High Pass Filter states */ 160 int32_t xvtx[5], yvtx[5]; 161 int32_t xvrx[5], yvrx[5]; 162 163 /* Parameters for the optional Hoth noise generator */ 164 int cng_level; 165 int cng_rndnum; 166 int cng_filter; 167 168 /* snapshot sample of coeffs used for development */ 169 int16_t *snapshot; 170}; 171 172#endif /* __ECHO_H */