Linux kernel mirror (for testing)
git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
kernel
os
linux
fork
Configure Feed
Select the types of activity you want to include in your feed.
1/*
2 * SpanDSP - a series of DSP components for telephony
3 *
4 * echo.c - A line echo canceller. This code is being developed
5 * against and partially complies with G168.
6 *
7 * Written by Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org>
8 * and David Rowe <david_at_rowetel_dot_com>
9 *
10 * Copyright (C) 2001 Steve Underwood and 2007 David Rowe
11 *
12 * All rights reserved.
13 *
14 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
15 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2, as
16 * published by the Free Software Foundation.
17 *
18 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
19 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
20 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
21 * GNU General Public License for more details.
22 *
23 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
24 * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
25 * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
26 *
27 * $Id: echo.h,v 1.9 2006/10/24 13:45:28 steveu Exp $
28 */
29
30#ifndef __ECHO_H
31#define __ECHO_H
32
33/*! \page echo_can_page Line echo cancellation for voice
34
35\section echo_can_page_sec_1 What does it do?
36This module aims to provide G.168-2002 compliant echo cancellation, to remove
37electrical echoes (e.g. from 2-4 wire hybrids) from voice calls.
38
39\section echo_can_page_sec_2 How does it work?
40The heart of the echo cancellor is FIR filter. This is adapted to match the
41echo impulse response of the telephone line. It must be long enough to
42adequately cover the duration of that impulse response. The signal transmitted
43to the telephone line is passed through the FIR filter. Once the FIR is
44properly adapted, the resulting output is an estimate of the echo signal
45received from the line. This is subtracted from the received signal. The result
46is an estimate of the signal which originated at the far end of the line, free
47from echos of our own transmitted signal.
48
49The least mean squares (LMS) algorithm is attributed to Widrow and Hoff, and
50was introduced in 1960. It is the commonest form of filter adaption used in
51things like modem line equalisers and line echo cancellers. There it works very
52well. However, it only works well for signals of constant amplitude. It works
53very poorly for things like speech echo cancellation, where the signal level
54varies widely. This is quite easy to fix. If the signal level is normalised -
55similar to applying AGC - LMS can work as well for a signal of varying
56amplitude as it does for a modem signal. This normalised least mean squares
57(NLMS) algorithm is the commonest one used for speech echo cancellation. Many
58other algorithms exist - e.g. RLS (essentially the same as Kalman filtering),
59FAP, etc. Some perform significantly better than NLMS. However, factors such
60as computational complexity and patents favour the use of NLMS.
61
62A simple refinement to NLMS can improve its performance with speech. NLMS tends
63to adapt best to the strongest parts of a signal. If the signal is white noise,
64the NLMS algorithm works very well. However, speech has more low frequency than
65high frequency content. Pre-whitening (i.e. filtering the signal to flatten its
66spectrum) the echo signal improves the adapt rate for speech, and ensures the
67final residual signal is not heavily biased towards high frequencies. A very
68low complexity filter is adequate for this, so pre-whitening adds little to the
69compute requirements of the echo canceller.
70
71An FIR filter adapted using pre-whitened NLMS performs well, provided certain
72conditions are met:
73
74 - The transmitted signal has poor self-correlation.
75 - There is no signal being generated within the environment being
76 cancelled.
77
78The difficulty is that neither of these can be guaranteed.
79
80If the adaption is performed while transmitting noise (or something fairly
81noise like, such as voice) the adaption works very well. If the adaption is
82performed while transmitting something highly correlative (typically narrow
83band energy such as signalling tones or DTMF), the adaption can go seriously
84wrong. The reason is there is only one solution for the adaption on a near
85random signal - the impulse response of the line. For a repetitive signal,
86there are any number of solutions which converge the adaption, and nothing
87guides the adaption to choose the generalised one. Allowing an untrained
88canceller to converge on this kind of narrowband energy probably a good thing,
89since at least it cancels the tones. Allowing a well converged canceller to
90continue converging on such energy is just a way to ruin its generalised
91adaption. A narrowband detector is needed, so adapation can be suspended at
92appropriate times.
93
94The adaption process is based on trying to eliminate the received signal. When
95there is any signal from within the environment being cancelled it may upset
96the adaption process. Similarly, if the signal we are transmitting is small,
97noise may dominate and disturb the adaption process. If we can ensure that the
98adaption is only performed when we are transmitting a significant signal level,
99and the environment is not, things will be OK. Clearly, it is easy to tell when
100we are sending a significant signal. Telling, if the environment is generating
101a significant signal, and doing it with sufficient speed that the adaption will
102not have diverged too much more we stop it, is a little harder.
103
104The key problem in detecting when the environment is sourcing significant
105energy is that we must do this very quickly. Given a reasonably long sample of
106the received signal, there are a number of strategies which may be used to
107assess whether that signal contains a strong far end component. However, by the
108time that assessment is complete the far end signal will have already caused
109major mis-convergence in the adaption process. An assessment algorithm is
110needed which produces a fairly accurate result from a very short burst of far
111end energy.
112
113\section echo_can_page_sec_3 How do I use it?
114The echo cancellor processes both the transmit and receive streams sample by
115sample. The processing function is not declared inline. Unfortunately,
116cancellation requires many operations per sample, so the call overhead is only
117a minor burden.
118*/
119
120#include "fir.h"
121#include "oslec.h"
122
123/*!
124 G.168 echo canceller descriptor. This defines the working state for a line
125 echo canceller.
126*/
127struct oslec_state {
128 int16_t tx, rx;
129 int16_t clean;
130 int16_t clean_nlp;
131
132 int nonupdate_dwell;
133 int curr_pos;
134 int taps;
135 int log2taps;
136 int adaption_mode;
137
138 int cond_met;
139 int32_t Pstates;
140 int16_t adapt;
141 int32_t factor;
142 int16_t shift;
143
144 /* Average levels and averaging filter states */
145 int Ltxacc, Lrxacc, Lcleanacc, Lclean_bgacc;
146 int Ltx, Lrx;
147 int Lclean;
148 int Lclean_bg;
149 int Lbgn, Lbgn_acc, Lbgn_upper, Lbgn_upper_acc;
150
151 /* foreground and background filter states */
152 struct fir16_state_t fir_state;
153 struct fir16_state_t fir_state_bg;
154 int16_t *fir_taps16[2];
155
156 /* DC blocking filter states */
157 int tx_1, tx_2, rx_1, rx_2;
158
159 /* optional High Pass Filter states */
160 int32_t xvtx[5], yvtx[5];
161 int32_t xvrx[5], yvrx[5];
162
163 /* Parameters for the optional Hoth noise generator */
164 int cng_level;
165 int cng_rndnum;
166 int cng_filter;
167
168 /* snapshot sample of coeffs used for development */
169 int16_t *snapshot;
170};
171
172#endif /* __ECHO_H */