Linux kernel mirror (for testing) git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
kernel os linux
at v2.6.29-rc4 638 lines 20 kB view raw
1/* 2 * SpanDSP - a series of DSP components for telephony 3 * 4 * echo.c - A line echo canceller. This code is being developed 5 * against and partially complies with G168. 6 * 7 * Written by Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org> 8 * and David Rowe <david_at_rowetel_dot_com> 9 * 10 * Copyright (C) 2001, 2003 Steve Underwood, 2007 David Rowe 11 * 12 * Based on a bit from here, a bit from there, eye of toad, ear of 13 * bat, 15 years of failed attempts by David and a few fried brain 14 * cells. 15 * 16 * All rights reserved. 17 * 18 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify 19 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2, as 20 * published by the Free Software Foundation. 21 * 22 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, 23 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of 24 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the 25 * GNU General Public License for more details. 26 * 27 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License 28 * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software 29 * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. 30 * 31 * $Id: echo.c,v 1.20 2006/12/01 18:00:48 steveu Exp $ 32 */ 33 34/*! \file */ 35 36/* Implementation Notes 37 David Rowe 38 April 2007 39 40 This code started life as Steve's NLMS algorithm with a tap 41 rotation algorithm to handle divergence during double talk. I 42 added a Geigel Double Talk Detector (DTD) [2] and performed some 43 G168 tests. However I had trouble meeting the G168 requirements, 44 especially for double talk - there were always cases where my DTD 45 failed, for example where near end speech was under the 6dB 46 threshold required for declaring double talk. 47 48 So I tried a two path algorithm [1], which has so far given better 49 results. The original tap rotation/Geigel algorithm is available 50 in SVN http://svn.rowetel.com/software/oslec/tags/before_16bit. 51 It's probably possible to make it work if some one wants to put some 52 serious work into it. 53 54 At present no special treatment is provided for tones, which 55 generally cause NLMS algorithms to diverge. Initial runs of a 56 subset of the G168 tests for tones (e.g ./echo_test 6) show the 57 current algorithm is passing OK, which is kind of surprising. The 58 full set of tests needs to be performed to confirm this result. 59 60 One other interesting change is that I have managed to get the NLMS 61 code to work with 16 bit coefficients, rather than the original 32 62 bit coefficents. This reduces the MIPs and storage required. 63 I evaulated the 16 bit port using g168_tests.sh and listening tests 64 on 4 real-world samples. 65 66 I also attempted the implementation of a block based NLMS update 67 [2] but although this passes g168_tests.sh it didn't converge well 68 on the real-world samples. I have no idea why, perhaps a scaling 69 problem. The block based code is also available in SVN 70 http://svn.rowetel.com/software/oslec/tags/before_16bit. If this 71 code can be debugged, it will lead to further reduction in MIPS, as 72 the block update code maps nicely onto DSP instruction sets (it's a 73 dot product) compared to the current sample-by-sample update. 74 75 Steve also has some nice notes on echo cancellers in echo.h 76 77 References: 78 79 [1] Ochiai, Areseki, and Ogihara, "Echo Canceller with Two Echo 80 Path Models", IEEE Transactions on communications, COM-25, 81 No. 6, June 82 1977. 83 http://www.rowetel.com/images/echo/dual_path_paper.pdf 84 85 [2] The classic, very useful paper that tells you how to 86 actually build a real world echo canceller: 87 Messerschmitt, Hedberg, Cole, Haoui, Winship, "Digital Voice 88 Echo Canceller with a TMS320020, 89 http://www.rowetel.com/images/echo/spra129.pdf 90 91 [3] I have written a series of blog posts on this work, here is 92 Part 1: http://www.rowetel.com/blog/?p=18 93 94 [4] The source code http://svn.rowetel.com/software/oslec/ 95 96 [5] A nice reference on LMS filters: 97 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_mean_squares_filter 98 99 Credits: 100 101 Thanks to Steve Underwood, Jean-Marc Valin, and Ramakrishnan 102 Muthukrishnan for their suggestions and email discussions. Thanks 103 also to those people who collected echo samples for me such as 104 Mark, Pawel, and Pavel. 105*/ 106 107#include <linux/kernel.h> /* We're doing kernel work */ 108#include <linux/module.h> 109#include <linux/slab.h> 110 111#include "bit_operations.h" 112#include "echo.h" 113 114#define MIN_TX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION 64 115#define MIN_RX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION 64 116#define DTD_HANGOVER 600 /* 600 samples, or 75ms */ 117#define DC_LOG2BETA 3 /* log2() of DC filter Beta */ 118 119/*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*\ 120 FUNCTIONS 121\*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*/ 122 123/* adapting coeffs using the traditional stochastic descent (N)LMS algorithm */ 124 125#ifdef __bfin__ 126static void __inline__ lms_adapt_bg(struct oslec_state *ec, int clean, 127 int shift) 128{ 129 int i, j; 130 int offset1; 131 int offset2; 132 int factor; 133 int exp; 134 int16_t *phist; 135 int n; 136 137 if (shift > 0) 138 factor = clean << shift; 139 else 140 factor = clean >> -shift; 141 142 /* Update the FIR taps */ 143 144 offset2 = ec->curr_pos; 145 offset1 = ec->taps - offset2; 146 phist = &ec->fir_state_bg.history[offset2]; 147 148 /* st: and en: help us locate the assembler in echo.s */ 149 150 //asm("st:"); 151 n = ec->taps; 152 for (i = 0, j = offset2; i < n; i++, j++) { 153 exp = *phist++ * factor; 154 ec->fir_taps16[1][i] += (int16_t) ((exp + (1 << 14)) >> 15); 155 } 156 //asm("en:"); 157 158 /* Note the asm for the inner loop above generated by Blackfin gcc 159 4.1.1 is pretty good (note even parallel instructions used): 160 161 R0 = W [P0++] (X); 162 R0 *= R2; 163 R0 = R0 + R3 (NS) || 164 R1 = W [P1] (X) || 165 nop; 166 R0 >>>= 15; 167 R0 = R0 + R1; 168 W [P1++] = R0; 169 170 A block based update algorithm would be much faster but the 171 above can't be improved on much. Every instruction saved in 172 the loop above is 2 MIPs/ch! The for loop above is where the 173 Blackfin spends most of it's time - about 17 MIPs/ch measured 174 with speedtest.c with 256 taps (32ms). Write-back and 175 Write-through cache gave about the same performance. 176 */ 177} 178 179/* 180 IDEAS for further optimisation of lms_adapt_bg(): 181 182 1/ The rounding is quite costly. Could we keep as 32 bit coeffs 183 then make filter pluck the MS 16-bits of the coeffs when filtering? 184 However this would lower potential optimisation of filter, as I 185 think the dual-MAC architecture requires packed 16 bit coeffs. 186 187 2/ Block based update would be more efficient, as per comments above, 188 could use dual MAC architecture. 189 190 3/ Look for same sample Blackfin LMS code, see if we can get dual-MAC 191 packing. 192 193 4/ Execute the whole e/c in a block of say 20ms rather than sample 194 by sample. Processing a few samples every ms is inefficient. 195*/ 196 197#else 198static __inline__ void lms_adapt_bg(struct oslec_state *ec, int clean, 199 int shift) 200{ 201 int i; 202 203 int offset1; 204 int offset2; 205 int factor; 206 int exp; 207 208 if (shift > 0) 209 factor = clean << shift; 210 else 211 factor = clean >> -shift; 212 213 /* Update the FIR taps */ 214 215 offset2 = ec->curr_pos; 216 offset1 = ec->taps - offset2; 217 218 for (i = ec->taps - 1; i >= offset1; i--) { 219 exp = (ec->fir_state_bg.history[i - offset1] * factor); 220 ec->fir_taps16[1][i] += (int16_t) ((exp + (1 << 14)) >> 15); 221 } 222 for (; i >= 0; i--) { 223 exp = (ec->fir_state_bg.history[i + offset2] * factor); 224 ec->fir_taps16[1][i] += (int16_t) ((exp + (1 << 14)) >> 15); 225 } 226} 227#endif 228 229struct oslec_state *oslec_create(int len, int adaption_mode) 230{ 231 struct oslec_state *ec; 232 int i; 233 234 ec = kzalloc(sizeof(*ec), GFP_KERNEL); 235 if (!ec) 236 return NULL; 237 238 ec->taps = len; 239 ec->log2taps = top_bit(len); 240 ec->curr_pos = ec->taps - 1; 241 242 for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { 243 ec->fir_taps16[i] = 244 kcalloc(ec->taps, sizeof(int16_t), GFP_KERNEL); 245 if (!ec->fir_taps16[i]) 246 goto error_oom; 247 } 248 249 fir16_create(&ec->fir_state, ec->fir_taps16[0], ec->taps); 250 fir16_create(&ec->fir_state_bg, ec->fir_taps16[1], ec->taps); 251 252 for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) { 253 ec->xvtx[i] = ec->yvtx[i] = ec->xvrx[i] = ec->yvrx[i] = 0; 254 } 255 256 ec->cng_level = 1000; 257 oslec_adaption_mode(ec, adaption_mode); 258 259 ec->snapshot = kcalloc(ec->taps, sizeof(int16_t), GFP_KERNEL); 260 if (!ec->snapshot) 261 goto error_oom; 262 263 ec->cond_met = 0; 264 ec->Pstates = 0; 265 ec->Ltxacc = ec->Lrxacc = ec->Lcleanacc = ec->Lclean_bgacc = 0; 266 ec->Ltx = ec->Lrx = ec->Lclean = ec->Lclean_bg = 0; 267 ec->tx_1 = ec->tx_2 = ec->rx_1 = ec->rx_2 = 0; 268 ec->Lbgn = ec->Lbgn_acc = 0; 269 ec->Lbgn_upper = 200; 270 ec->Lbgn_upper_acc = ec->Lbgn_upper << 13; 271 272 return ec; 273 274 error_oom: 275 for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) 276 kfree(ec->fir_taps16[i]); 277 278 kfree(ec); 279 return NULL; 280} 281 282EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_create); 283 284void oslec_free(struct oslec_state *ec) 285{ 286 int i; 287 288 fir16_free(&ec->fir_state); 289 fir16_free(&ec->fir_state_bg); 290 for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) 291 kfree(ec->fir_taps16[i]); 292 kfree(ec->snapshot); 293 kfree(ec); 294} 295 296EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_free); 297 298void oslec_adaption_mode(struct oslec_state *ec, int adaption_mode) 299{ 300 ec->adaption_mode = adaption_mode; 301} 302 303EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_adaption_mode); 304 305void oslec_flush(struct oslec_state *ec) 306{ 307 int i; 308 309 ec->Ltxacc = ec->Lrxacc = ec->Lcleanacc = ec->Lclean_bgacc = 0; 310 ec->Ltx = ec->Lrx = ec->Lclean = ec->Lclean_bg = 0; 311 ec->tx_1 = ec->tx_2 = ec->rx_1 = ec->rx_2 = 0; 312 313 ec->Lbgn = ec->Lbgn_acc = 0; 314 ec->Lbgn_upper = 200; 315 ec->Lbgn_upper_acc = ec->Lbgn_upper << 13; 316 317 ec->nonupdate_dwell = 0; 318 319 fir16_flush(&ec->fir_state); 320 fir16_flush(&ec->fir_state_bg); 321 ec->fir_state.curr_pos = ec->taps - 1; 322 ec->fir_state_bg.curr_pos = ec->taps - 1; 323 for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) 324 memset(ec->fir_taps16[i], 0, ec->taps * sizeof(int16_t)); 325 326 ec->curr_pos = ec->taps - 1; 327 ec->Pstates = 0; 328} 329 330EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_flush); 331 332void oslec_snapshot(struct oslec_state *ec) 333{ 334 memcpy(ec->snapshot, ec->fir_taps16[0], ec->taps * sizeof(int16_t)); 335} 336 337EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_snapshot); 338 339/* Dual Path Echo Canceller ------------------------------------------------*/ 340 341int16_t oslec_update(struct oslec_state *ec, int16_t tx, int16_t rx) 342{ 343 int32_t echo_value; 344 int clean_bg; 345 int tmp, tmp1; 346 347 /* Input scaling was found be required to prevent problems when tx 348 starts clipping. Another possible way to handle this would be the 349 filter coefficent scaling. */ 350 351 ec->tx = tx; 352 ec->rx = rx; 353 tx >>= 1; 354 rx >>= 1; 355 356 /* 357 Filter DC, 3dB point is 160Hz (I think), note 32 bit precision required 358 otherwise values do not track down to 0. Zero at DC, Pole at (1-Beta) 359 only real axis. Some chip sets (like Si labs) don't need 360 this, but something like a $10 X100P card does. Any DC really slows 361 down convergence. 362 363 Note: removes some low frequency from the signal, this reduces 364 the speech quality when listening to samples through headphones 365 but may not be obvious through a telephone handset. 366 367 Note that the 3dB frequency in radians is approx Beta, e.g. for 368 Beta = 2^(-3) = 0.125, 3dB freq is 0.125 rads = 159Hz. 369 */ 370 371 if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_RX_HPF) { 372 tmp = rx << 15; 373#if 1 374 /* Make sure the gain of the HPF is 1.0. This can still saturate a little under 375 impulse conditions, and it might roll to 32768 and need clipping on sustained peak 376 level signals. However, the scale of such clipping is small, and the error due to 377 any saturation should not markedly affect the downstream processing. */ 378 tmp -= (tmp >> 4); 379#endif 380 ec->rx_1 += -(ec->rx_1 >> DC_LOG2BETA) + tmp - ec->rx_2; 381 382 /* hard limit filter to prevent clipping. Note that at this stage 383 rx should be limited to +/- 16383 due to right shift above */ 384 tmp1 = ec->rx_1 >> 15; 385 if (tmp1 > 16383) 386 tmp1 = 16383; 387 if (tmp1 < -16383) 388 tmp1 = -16383; 389 rx = tmp1; 390 ec->rx_2 = tmp; 391 } 392 393 /* Block average of power in the filter states. Used for 394 adaption power calculation. */ 395 396 { 397 int new, old; 398 399 /* efficient "out with the old and in with the new" algorithm so 400 we don't have to recalculate over the whole block of 401 samples. */ 402 new = (int)tx *(int)tx; 403 old = (int)ec->fir_state.history[ec->fir_state.curr_pos] * 404 (int)ec->fir_state.history[ec->fir_state.curr_pos]; 405 ec->Pstates += 406 ((new - old) + (1 << ec->log2taps)) >> ec->log2taps; 407 if (ec->Pstates < 0) 408 ec->Pstates = 0; 409 } 410 411 /* Calculate short term average levels using simple single pole IIRs */ 412 413 ec->Ltxacc += abs(tx) - ec->Ltx; 414 ec->Ltx = (ec->Ltxacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5; 415 ec->Lrxacc += abs(rx) - ec->Lrx; 416 ec->Lrx = (ec->Lrxacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5; 417 418 /* Foreground filter --------------------------------------------------- */ 419 420 ec->fir_state.coeffs = ec->fir_taps16[0]; 421 echo_value = fir16(&ec->fir_state, tx); 422 ec->clean = rx - echo_value; 423 ec->Lcleanacc += abs(ec->clean) - ec->Lclean; 424 ec->Lclean = (ec->Lcleanacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5; 425 426 /* Background filter --------------------------------------------------- */ 427 428 echo_value = fir16(&ec->fir_state_bg, tx); 429 clean_bg = rx - echo_value; 430 ec->Lclean_bgacc += abs(clean_bg) - ec->Lclean_bg; 431 ec->Lclean_bg = (ec->Lclean_bgacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5; 432 433 /* Background Filter adaption ----------------------------------------- */ 434 435 /* Almost always adap bg filter, just simple DT and energy 436 detection to minimise adaption in cases of strong double talk. 437 However this is not critical for the dual path algorithm. 438 */ 439 ec->factor = 0; 440 ec->shift = 0; 441 if ((ec->nonupdate_dwell == 0)) { 442 int P, logP, shift; 443 444 /* Determine: 445 446 f = Beta * clean_bg_rx/P ------ (1) 447 448 where P is the total power in the filter states. 449 450 The Boffins have shown that if we obey (1) we converge 451 quickly and avoid instability. 452 453 The correct factor f must be in Q30, as this is the fixed 454 point format required by the lms_adapt_bg() function, 455 therefore the scaled version of (1) is: 456 457 (2^30) * f = (2^30) * Beta * clean_bg_rx/P 458 factor = (2^30) * Beta * clean_bg_rx/P ----- (2) 459 460 We have chosen Beta = 0.25 by experiment, so: 461 462 factor = (2^30) * (2^-2) * clean_bg_rx/P 463 464 (30 - 2 - log2(P)) 465 factor = clean_bg_rx 2 ----- (3) 466 467 To avoid a divide we approximate log2(P) as top_bit(P), 468 which returns the position of the highest non-zero bit in 469 P. This approximation introduces an error as large as a 470 factor of 2, but the algorithm seems to handle it OK. 471 472 Come to think of it a divide may not be a big deal on a 473 modern DSP, so its probably worth checking out the cycles 474 for a divide versus a top_bit() implementation. 475 */ 476 477 P = MIN_TX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION + ec->Pstates; 478 logP = top_bit(P) + ec->log2taps; 479 shift = 30 - 2 - logP; 480 ec->shift = shift; 481 482 lms_adapt_bg(ec, clean_bg, shift); 483 } 484 485 /* very simple DTD to make sure we dont try and adapt with strong 486 near end speech */ 487 488 ec->adapt = 0; 489 if ((ec->Lrx > MIN_RX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION) && (ec->Lrx > ec->Ltx)) 490 ec->nonupdate_dwell = DTD_HANGOVER; 491 if (ec->nonupdate_dwell) 492 ec->nonupdate_dwell--; 493 494 /* Transfer logic ------------------------------------------------------ */ 495 496 /* These conditions are from the dual path paper [1], I messed with 497 them a bit to improve performance. */ 498 499 if ((ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_ADAPTION) && 500 (ec->nonupdate_dwell == 0) && 501 (8 * ec->Lclean_bg < 502 7 * ec->Lclean) /* (ec->Lclean_bg < 0.875*ec->Lclean) */ && 503 (8 * ec->Lclean_bg < 504 ec->Ltx) /* (ec->Lclean_bg < 0.125*ec->Ltx) */ ) { 505 if (ec->cond_met == 6) { 506 /* BG filter has had better results for 6 consecutive samples */ 507 ec->adapt = 1; 508 memcpy(ec->fir_taps16[0], ec->fir_taps16[1], 509 ec->taps * sizeof(int16_t)); 510 } else 511 ec->cond_met++; 512 } else 513 ec->cond_met = 0; 514 515 /* Non-Linear Processing --------------------------------------------------- */ 516 517 ec->clean_nlp = ec->clean; 518 if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_NLP) { 519 /* Non-linear processor - a fancy way to say "zap small signals, to avoid 520 residual echo due to (uLaw/ALaw) non-linearity in the channel.". */ 521 522 if ((16 * ec->Lclean < ec->Ltx)) { 523 /* Our e/c has improved echo by at least 24 dB (each factor of 2 is 6dB, 524 so 2*2*2*2=16 is the same as 6+6+6+6=24dB) */ 525 if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_CNG) { 526 ec->cng_level = ec->Lbgn; 527 528 /* Very elementary comfort noise generation. Just random 529 numbers rolled off very vaguely Hoth-like. DR: This 530 noise doesn't sound quite right to me - I suspect there 531 are some overlfow issues in the filtering as it's too 532 "crackly". TODO: debug this, maybe just play noise at 533 high level or look at spectrum. 534 */ 535 536 ec->cng_rndnum = 537 1664525U * ec->cng_rndnum + 1013904223U; 538 ec->cng_filter = 539 ((ec->cng_rndnum & 0xFFFF) - 32768 + 540 5 * ec->cng_filter) >> 3; 541 ec->clean_nlp = 542 (ec->cng_filter * ec->cng_level * 8) >> 14; 543 544 } else if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_CLIP) { 545 /* This sounds much better than CNG */ 546 if (ec->clean_nlp > ec->Lbgn) 547 ec->clean_nlp = ec->Lbgn; 548 if (ec->clean_nlp < -ec->Lbgn) 549 ec->clean_nlp = -ec->Lbgn; 550 } else { 551 /* just mute the residual, doesn't sound very good, used mainly 552 in G168 tests */ 553 ec->clean_nlp = 0; 554 } 555 } else { 556 /* Background noise estimator. I tried a few algorithms 557 here without much luck. This very simple one seems to 558 work best, we just average the level using a slow (1 sec 559 time const) filter if the current level is less than a 560 (experimentally derived) constant. This means we dont 561 include high level signals like near end speech. When 562 combined with CNG or especially CLIP seems to work OK. 563 */ 564 if (ec->Lclean < 40) { 565 ec->Lbgn_acc += abs(ec->clean) - ec->Lbgn; 566 ec->Lbgn = (ec->Lbgn_acc + (1 << 11)) >> 12; 567 } 568 } 569 } 570 571 /* Roll around the taps buffer */ 572 if (ec->curr_pos <= 0) 573 ec->curr_pos = ec->taps; 574 ec->curr_pos--; 575 576 if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_DISABLE) 577 ec->clean_nlp = rx; 578 579 /* Output scaled back up again to match input scaling */ 580 581 return (int16_t) ec->clean_nlp << 1; 582} 583 584EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_update); 585 586/* This function is seperated from the echo canceller is it is usually called 587 as part of the tx process. See rx HP (DC blocking) filter above, it's 588 the same design. 589 590 Some soft phones send speech signals with a lot of low frequency 591 energy, e.g. down to 20Hz. This can make the hybrid non-linear 592 which causes the echo canceller to fall over. This filter can help 593 by removing any low frequency before it gets to the tx port of the 594 hybrid. 595 596 It can also help by removing and DC in the tx signal. DC is bad 597 for LMS algorithms. 598 599 This is one of the classic DC removal filters, adjusted to provide sufficient 600 bass rolloff to meet the above requirement to protect hybrids from things that 601 upset them. The difference between successive samples produces a lousy HPF, and 602 then a suitably placed pole flattens things out. The final result is a nicely 603 rolled off bass end. The filtering is implemented with extended fractional 604 precision, which noise shapes things, giving very clean DC removal. 605*/ 606 607int16_t oslec_hpf_tx(struct oslec_state * ec, int16_t tx) 608{ 609 int tmp, tmp1; 610 611 if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_TX_HPF) { 612 tmp = tx << 15; 613#if 1 614 /* Make sure the gain of the HPF is 1.0. The first can still saturate a little under 615 impulse conditions, and it might roll to 32768 and need clipping on sustained peak 616 level signals. However, the scale of such clipping is small, and the error due to 617 any saturation should not markedly affect the downstream processing. */ 618 tmp -= (tmp >> 4); 619#endif 620 ec->tx_1 += -(ec->tx_1 >> DC_LOG2BETA) + tmp - ec->tx_2; 621 tmp1 = ec->tx_1 >> 15; 622 if (tmp1 > 32767) 623 tmp1 = 32767; 624 if (tmp1 < -32767) 625 tmp1 = -32767; 626 tx = tmp1; 627 ec->tx_2 = tmp; 628 } 629 630 return tx; 631} 632 633EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_hpf_tx); 634 635MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); 636MODULE_AUTHOR("David Rowe"); 637MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Open Source Line Echo Canceller"); 638MODULE_VERSION("0.3.0");