My PhD dissertation.
1*#align(center)[#smallcaps[@conclusions-limitations-and-future-directions[Chapter]]]*
2= #smallcaps[Conclusions, limitations, and future directions]
3<conclusions-limitations-and-future-directions>
4== Conclusions
5<conclusions>
6This dissertation has presented novel methods to design mechanosensitive
7graft polymers, highly crosslinked bottlebrush polymers, and living
8hydrogels. Utilizing shielding PEG chains to provide a steric barrier to
9an otherwise efficient crosslinking reaction between amines or thiols
10and epoxides, I was able to produce mechanosensitive polymers that
11undergo a sol-gel transition in response to ultrasound. This approach to
12creating strain sensitive materials provides a facile route to creating
13strain responsive materials using commercially available monomers and
14simple techniques. I demonstrated, for the first time, a sol-gel
15transition accelerated under force using shielded reactive polymers. I
16synthesized novel thermosetting bottlebrush polymers containing both
17reactive glycidyl groups and rubbery butyl methacrylate. By adjusting
18polymer architecture I was able to suppress intermolecular crosslinks
19and increase the toughness of highly crosslinked bottlebrush polymers.
20In doing so I demonstrated a method for creating very high molecular
21weight thermosetting polymers with high toughness and modulus.
22Additionally, I demonstrated bis(xan)-mediated PI polymerizations to be
23tolerant to oxygen and produce telechelic polymers. Xanthate-capped
24hydrophilic polymers were shown to crosslink in the presence of a
25tri-functional crosslinker in $tilde.op$1.5 min. This approach provides
26a facile route to quick hydrogel fabrication using light in the visible
27spectrum, at physiological temperature, in air and water, and without
28radical initiators and their decomposition products. In all cases,
29careful design of initiator structure and polymer architecture enabled
30the production of novel materials. I foresee that this work will enable
31the development of new high performance coatings, adhesives, and
32biocompatible materials.
33
34== Materials and methods
35<materials-and-methods>
36=== Chemical sourcing
37<chemical-sourcing>
38Materials were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise mentioned.
39(APMA, 98%), Jeffamine ED-600, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) methyl ether
40methacrylate (950 g/mol, PEGMA950), 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA,
4198%), (CPA), (99%), pyridine (anhydrous, 99%), dichloromethane (DCM,
42anhydrous, 99%), dioxane (99%), CuBr#sub[2] (99%),
431,5,7-triazabicyclo\[4.4.0\]dec-5-ene (TBD, 98%), (EBPA, 97%), (, 99%),
441,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine (TMG, 99%), and azobisisobutyronitrile
45(AIBN, 99%), were used as received. Glycidyl methacrylate (GMA, 99%),
46butyl methacrylate (BMA, 99%), 2-ethyhexyl methacrylate (EHMA, 98%),
472-methoxyethyl methacrylate (MEMA, 99%), and 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl
48methacrylate (AAEM, 95%) were passed through a column of basic alumina
49to remove inhibitors. CuBr (99.9%) was purified by stirring in glacial
50acetic acid. Tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPMA, 98%), tris
512-(dimethylamino)ethyl amine (Me#sub[6]TREN, 98%), cyclopentylmethyl
52ether (CPME, 99%), and 2-cyano-2-propyl dodecyl trithiocarbonate (CPDT,
5397%) was purchased from TCI (Tokyo, Japan) and used as received.
54Methanol (99%), toluene (99%), dimethylformamide (DMF, 99%), isopropanol
55(99%), calcium chloride (99%) diethyl ether (anhydrous, 99%),
56tetrahydrofuran (THF, 99%), HCl (concentrated), reduced iron powder,
57copper turnings, basic alumina, and neutral alumina were purchased from
58Thermo Fisher (Waltham, MA) and used as received.
59
60=== Synthesis of polyinitiator and vitrimers containing GMA
61<synthesis-of-polyinitiator-and-vitrimers-containing-gma>
62Details of the synthesis of poly(BIEM), linear vitrimers, and
63bottlebrush vitrimers, and their formulation can be found in Chapter
643.2.
65
66=== Representative PEG shielded and control polymer synthesis
67<representative-peg-shielded-and-control-polymer-synthesis>
68Poly(GMA_-co-_PEGMA950), poly(AAEM_-co-_PEGMA950), and of all molar ratios
69and degree of polymerization (DP) were synthesized by reversible
70addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. Each reaction
71was fed 0.01 moles of monomer total. For example, 0.71 g (0.005 mol)
72GMA, 0.72 g (0.005 mol) MEMA, 0.0559 g CPA (0.2 mmol), 6.6 mg AIBN (0.04
73mmol) (\[50\]:\[1\]:\[0.2\] \[M\]:\[CTA\]:\[I\], where \[M\]:\[CTA\]
74defines the DP), 4 mL of 1,4-dioxane, and a stir bar were added to a 20
75mL scintillation vial. Polymers containing APMA were synthesized in 1:1
76dioxane:water. The vial was sealed with a rubber septum and the solution
77was purged with N#sub[2] (g) for $tilde.op$20-30 min in an ice bath to
78prevent solvent and monomer evaporation (PEGMA solutions were bubbled in
79cool water to prevent PEG crystallization). Subsequently, the vial was
80placed in a thermostated aluminum reaction block at 60 °C on top of a
81magnetic stir/hot plate. The reaction was left to stir overnight,
82yielding a viscous liquid. The solution was removed from heat and
83exposed to air to terminate the polymerization. The solution was
84precipitated into cold (-20 °C) ether, the solid washed twice more with
85cold ether, and dried at 0.01 mbar overnight. Polymers containing APMA
86were poured into a small amount of cold ether, shaken, then isopropanol
87was added to precipitate the polymer.
88
89=== Copolymer solution preparation
90<copolymer-solution-preparation>
91Polymer solutions were initially prepared to be 50 wt% polymer. For
92example, 0.3 g of polymer was dissolved in 0.3 g of solvent, and
93crosslinker was added such that the nucleophilic functional group was
94equimolar with the total epoxide concentration. To control for the
95concentration of crosslinking points in solution, polymers were
96subsequently formulated to be 1 M of epoxide in solution. Each sample
97was vortexed for 5 sec to ensure complete mixing before proceeding with
98rheometry or sonication.
99
100For all experiments crosslinked with amines, reactions were conducted in
101a solvent system of 1:1 BuOH:DMF. Alcohols are known to catalyze the
102reaction between amines and epoxides through the formation of a
103trimolecular complex.@ehlers2007 Thiol-crosslinked reactions were
104conducted in MeCN with 10 µL of 2 M LiOH as a catalyst, necessary to
105deprotonate the thiols in order to perform a nucleophilic attack on the
106epoxide ring.@gadwal2015 Poly(APMA_-co-_MEMA) was first treated with
107pyridine to deprotonate the pendent amines.
108
109=== Parallel plate rheology
110<parallel-plate-rheology>
111Gelation times and storage moduli ($G'$), and tanδ of polymer
112solutions/gels were determined on a Kinexus Pro parallel plate rheometer
113(Netzsch, Selb, Bayern, Germany). Measurements were run on a 20 mm plate
114with a 1 mm gap at 1 % strain and 1 -- 100 rad s#super[-1] frequency sweep. Each
115frequency sweep lasted approximately 5 min, and the entire measurement
116lasted approximately 15 hr. The gel point was defined using the
117Winter-Chambon criterion, for which the time of gelation is defined as
118the point at which tanδ becomes frequency independent at small
119frequencies.@winter1986@chambon1985@chambon1987 For samples with very
120high modulus, the elastic modulus was determined using compressive
121rheology by taking the slope of the stress strain curve of cured gels
122with a 4 mm diameter. Rheological experiments were analyzed using IRIS
123Rheo-Hub (IRIS Development, Amherst, MA).@poh2022 For samples treated
124with 30 % strain, single frequency measurements were conducted at 1 Hz
125and 30 % strain for 10 minutes in between each frequency sweep.
126
127=== Time-temperature superposition measurements
128<time-temperature-superposition-measurements>
129Time-temperature superposition was conducted by performing frequency
130sweeps at 30 °C intervals with a DMA 850 (TA Instruments) equipped with
131a tension clamp. Frequency sweeps were performed at 0.01 % strain with a
132preload of 0.01 N .
133
134== Limitations
135<limitations>
136Thermosetting materials have come far from the crosslinked latex rubbers
137first developed by ancient Mesoamericans, and have transformed the world
138along the way. Polymer chemists have and continue to produce ever more
139sophisticated ways to prepare narrowly disperse polymers with diverse
140functionality enabling the synthesis of more and more exotic polymer
141architecture. Taking advantage of multiple methods of controlled/living
142polymerization enabled the bottom up molecular design of novel
143mechanosensitive comb polymers, highly crosslinked molecular
144bottlebrushes, and living hydrogels. While these materials do fill unmet
145needs for thermosetting resins and soft biocompatible materials, they
146still suffer from several drawbacks. Here I will detail the limitations
147of my approaches and how they might be overcome.
148
149=== PEG-shielded polymers require high strain and/or strain rates to induce crosslinking
150<peg-shielded-polymers-require-high-strain-andor-strain-rates-to-induce-crosslinking>
151Ultrasound is a convenient method for applying strong shear forces at
152high shear rates to polymers in solution on a laboratory scale. However,
153it is not necessarily a scaleable technique or easily accessible outside
154of laboratory environments. More relevant techniques involve parallel
155plate shear by forcefully spreading liquid on a solid substrate or
156extrusion of liquids through a narrow opening. To simulate these methods
157of straining polymer solutions, solutions pGMA_-co-_PEGMA950 and ethylene
158diamine were subjected to 30 % shear at 1 Hz on a parallel plate
159rheometer and extruded through a 27 Ga needled. Neither method showed
160any increase in the rate of gelation. Shear thinning was observed in the
161polymer solution, evidenced by a decrease in $G'$ after strain was applied
162(@fig:pegstrain). At a minimum, 20 kHz ultrasound at 10 %
163amplitude (50 W) was required to induce gelation of PEG shielded
164polymers. To enable more diverse applications, thermosetting polymers
165that are more sensitive to mechanical force should be developed.
166
167#figure(image("Images/C5F1.png", width: 100.0%),
168 placement: bottom,
169 caption: [
170 PEG shielded polymers are not activated by parallel plate shear. $G'$
171 evolution over time of pGMA_-co-_PEGMA950 at 1 % and 30 % strain.
172 ]
173)
174<fig:pegstrain>
175
176=== Steric shielding by PEG is not generalizable to all crosslinking chemistries
177<steric-shielding-by-peg-is-not-generalizable-to-all-crosslinking-chemistries>
178Although the PEG shielding groups are easily accessible and installed
179alongside reactive monomers on polymer backbones, they are not suitable
180for shielding all kinds of reactive monomers. Different applications
181demand different crosslinking chemistry. For example, ethylene diamine
182can be replaced with Jeffamines for decorative applications that require
183high clarity and transparency. Jeffamines are a class of amine
184terminated poloxamers developed specifically for preparing crosslinked
185epoxies, and their structure can be tuned to modulate the properties of
186the final crosslinked material. However, their large polymeric structure
187prevents them from diffusing to reactive sites flanked by large PEG
188shielding groups and forming crosslinks (@fig:jeffamineshield).
189
190#figure(image("Images/C5F2.png", width: 100.0%),
191 placement: auto,
192 caption: [
193 PEG shielding completely prevents gelation with Jeffamine. $G'$
194 evolution over time of pGMA_-co-_PEGMA950 in the presence of Jeffamine
195 ED-900.
196 ]
197)
198<fig:jeffamineshield>
199
200Other applications require quicker crosslinking kinetics@zoller2016 or
201reversible crosslinks.@denissen2015 For such applications, acetoacetoxy
202functional polymers offer an attractive option, forming vinylogous
203urethane bonds in the presence of primary amines. However, the
204(acetoacetoxy)ethyl ester is quite large, and most likely significantly
205alters chain conformations, lessening the steric effects of pendent PEG.
206Additionally, the tendency of the acetoacetoxy pendent groups to self
207assemble through hydrogen-bonding@schlaad2004 likely preemptively brings
208reactive monomers into contact, increasing the apparent rate of
209crosslinking. As such, PEG shielding groups are insufficient to protect
210acetoacetoxy reactive groups (@fig:aaemshield). To overcome this,
211more aggressive shielding methods are required.
212
213#figure(image("Images/C5F3.png", width: 100.0%),
214 placement: auto,
215 caption: [
216 pAAEM_-co-_PEGMA950 rapidly gels in the presence of primary amines. $G'$
217 evolution over time of pAAEM_-co-_PEGMA950 in in the presence of
218 pAPMA_-co-_MEMA.
219 ]
220)
221<fig:aaemshield>
222
223=== Grafting-from produces unstable brushes
224<grafting-from-produces-unstable-brushes>
225One of the most important properties of thermosetting coatings and
226adhesives is shelf stability. The formulated resin should remain inert
227until the user desires the material to crosslink. To simplify
228application, one pot formulations are ideal. To produce highly shielded
229acetoacetoxy polymers, I turned to core-shell bottlebrush polymers
230composed of an inner core of crosslinkable AAEM and an outer shell of
231rubbery EHMA. These polymers were prepared by the \"grafting from\"
232method as it enables longer side chain lengths. Initially it was
233believed that ATRP of AAEM would be impossible due to the 1,3-dicarbonyl
234interfering with the copper complex. However, some reports have shown
235the controlled polymerization of AAEM through traditional ATRP mediated
236by CuBr.@mandal2018
237
238To minimize the amount of copper halide required, poly(AAEM) was
239synthesized by SARA ATRP with Cu(0) as the reducing agent. This produced
240a polymer with a bimodal molecular weight distribution with the peak at
241shorter retention time being roughly double the molecular weight of the
242peak at longer retention time (@fig:saraaaem a). It is assumed
243that this is due to radical-radical coupling facilitated by chelation of
244coper bringing growing chains into close proximity. #super[1]H NMR
245clearly showed the presence of the acetoacetoxy group as well as the
246methacrylate backbone (@fig:saraaaem b). Replacing Cu(0) with
247Fe(0) as the reducing agent produced no polymer. This is to my knowledge
248the first SARA ATRP reported of AAEM.
249
250#figure(image("Images/C5F4.png", width: 100.0%),
251 placement: bottom,
252 caption: [
253 Characterization of pAAEM produced by SARA ATRP. (a) GPC
254 chromatogram of pAAEM. (b) #super[1]H NMR of pAAEM. Spectra recorded at 500 MHz in CDCl#sub[3]. THF used as eluent.
255 ]
256)
257<fig:saraaaem>
258
259Still, bottlebrush polymers with AAEM and ethylhexyl methacrylate
260copolymer sidechains were prepared by the same technique. However, all
261copolymers prepared were extremely unstable, often forming insoluble
262gels instantaneously upon precipitation. Only a single sample, pBIEM-_g_-(AAEM-_b_-EHMA), could
263be analyzed by NMR and GPC. GPC of showed a small shoulder at shorter
264retention times, indicating some amount of radical-radical coupling
265@fig:aaembrush a). #super[1]H NMR clearly showed the successful
266sequential polymerization of AAEM and EHMA from the BIEM backbone
267(@fig:aaembrush b).
268
269#figure(image("Images/C5F5.png", width: 100.0%),
270 placement: auto,
271 caption: [
272 Characterization of pBIEM_-g-_(AAEM_-b-_EHMA) prepared by SARA ATRP. (a)
273 GPC chromatogram of pBIEM_-g-_(AAEM_-b-_EHMA). (b) #super[1]H NMR of pBIEM_-g-_(AAEM_-b-_EHMA). Spectra recorded at 500 MHz in CDCl#sub[3]. THF used as eluent.
274 ]
275)
276<fig:aaembrush>
277
278Bottlebrush polymers prepared by ATRP \"grafting from\" are known to
279form C--C crosslinks at sidechain ends in the solid phase, even in the
280presence of ppm amounts of copper.@nese2011 Removal of copper from AAEM
281bottlebrushes was very difficult, presumably as a result of chelation
282between brush hairs, with copper being clearly visible even after
283passing through alumina. To make it easier to produce shelf stable
284bottlebrushes, AAEM was replaced with GMA, and EHMA was replaced with
285BMA. These bottlebrush polymers were able to be isolated as white solids
286after passing over alumina to remove the copper salts, but still were
287only stable for a few days at -20 °C. A different approach to synthesis
288would be required to produce highly shielded, reactive bottlebrush
289polymers with a long shelf life.
290
291=== GMA is not suitable for transesterification based vitrimers
292<gma-is-not-suitable-for-transesterification-based-vitrimers>
293Crosslinked bottlebrushes with GMA (co)polymer sidechains tend to have
294substantially lower elastic moduli compared to their linear
295counterparts. Controlling for total number of crosslinks possible, this
296suggests that not all crosslinking sites are being utilized. I
297hypothesized that the onset of vitrification during the cure process
298prevented the full conversion of epoxides by restricting chain mobility.
299In an attempt to overcome this and improve the elastic modulus of the
300bottlebrush polymers, I formulated vitrimers by incorporating a
301transesterification catalyst, TBD. Described in 2011 by Montarnal et
302al., vitrimers (sometimes referred to as covalent adaptable networks)
303are crosslinked thermosets with dynamic bonds that flow like glasses
304above a certain temperature.@montarnal2011
305
306#figure(image("Images/C5F6.png", width: 100.0%),
307 placement: auto,
308 caption: [
309 pGMA_-b-_BMA performs well as a reprocessible adhesive. (a) Fragments
310 of crosslinked pGMA_-b-_BMA are melt pressed into a homogeneous solid.
311 (b) An image of a rheometer stage showing that the epoxy adhesive
312 securing sandpaper to the bottom plate has failed, while pGMA_-b-_BMA
313 is still adhering the bottom sandpaper and top plate.
314 ]
315)
316<fig:gmavitrimer>
317
318TBD is well understood to enable network topology rearrangement above
319its characteristic topology freezing temperature through bond exchange
320reactions at β-hydroxyl-esters. As a practical test, crosslinked
321pGMA_-b-_BMA was broken into pieces and pressed in a mold at 120 °C,
322reforming into a disk within minutes (@fig:gmavitrimer a).
323Remarkably, it even outperformed a commercial epoxy glue during parallel
324plate rheology at 155 °C (@fig:gmavitrimer b). To attempt to
325measure the activation energy of vitrimer flow, I employed
326time-temperature superposition measurements using DMA.@meng2022 However,
327we were unable to cleanly superimpose the elastic modulus data (@fig:tts a) and no such vitrimer flow was recorded by DMA, even at
328temperatures exceeding 180 °C (@fig:tts b). It remains unclear
329what exactly caused this behavior. Additionally, pGMA, pGMA_-co-_BMA,
330pBIEM_-g-_GMA, pBIEM_-g-_(GMA_-b-_BMA), pBIEM_-g-_(BMA_-b-_GMA), and
331pBIEM_-g-_(GMA_-co-_BMA) all failed to superimpose cleanly and showed no
332ability to be reformed by melt pressing. Different dynamic crosslinking
333chemistry is required to drive polymeric vitrimers to full conversion.
334
335#figure([#box(image("Images/C5F7a.png", width: 100.0%))
336 #box(image("Images/C5F7b.png", width: 100.0%))
337
338 ],
339 placement: auto,
340 caption: [
341 Time-temperature superposition of pGMA_-b-_BMA. (a) Time-temperature
342 superposition of the elastic modulus of pGMA_-b-_BMA. (b)
343 Time-temperature superposition of the loss factor of pGMA_-b-_BMA.
344 ]
345)
346<fig:tts>
347
348== Future directions
349<future-directions>
350
351=== Improving elastic modulus of thermoset bottlebrushes
352<improving-elastic-modulus-of-thermoset-bottlebrushes>
353High-performance thermosetting resins are prized for their resistance to
354creep, temperature, and solvent, as well as their light weight. These
355same properties however make reprocessing and recycling impossible.
356Covalently crosslinked thermosets traditionally do not dissolve in
357solvent or melt at high temperature, unlike thermoplastics, meaning
358their shape is set at the onset of gelation. Additionally, the onset of
359gelation imposes vitrification on thermosetting resins whose $T_(c u r e)
360< T_g$, hampering further conversion of reactive sites. This is
361particularly problematic for bottlebrush polymers, whose large size
362produces already sluggish motion, making it very difficult to achieve
363full conversion and maximum modulus. I propose to introduce dynamic
364crosslinks to bottlebrush polymers in order to maximize the elastic
365modulus of bottlebrush thermosets by facilitating bond exchange through
366melt processing.
367
368#figure(image("Images/C5F8.png", width: 100.0%),
369 placement: auto,
370 caption: [
371 Proposed route to reactive bottlebrush polymers with labile side chains.
372 ]
373)
374<fig:bbpscheme>
375
376Though there are many available chemistries used to prepare vitrimers,
377imine exchange is most commonly used for polymeric vitrimers. Imine
378crosslinked polymers can be prepared by reacting aldehyde functional
379polymers in the presence of primary amines. Copolymer vitrimers based on
3802-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl vanillin, and aldehyde functional monomer, and
381plasticizing monomers have been demonstrated to undergo dynamic bond
382exchange.@stouten2023 Additionally, imine exchange requires no
383additional catalyst and occurs at lower temperatures. To prepare
384bottlebrush vitrimers in particular the use of styrenic monomers is
385preferred, both for their superior hydrolytic stability compared to
386(meth)acrylic monomers as well as for access to atom transfer nitroxide
387radical coupling reactions (ATNRC) for facile transformations of chain
388end halogens (@fig:bbpscheme).@teo2019 4-vinylbenzaldehyde (VBA)
389is an easily accessible monomer, though not commercially available.
390There are many reported routes to VBA, but I will relay two that give
391VBA in high yield, one by hydrolysis of p-(chloromethyl)styrene followed
392by oxidation to VBA (@fig:4vba a),@foyer2015 another by Wittig
393olefination of 4-(diethoxymethyl)benzaldehyde followed by deprotection
394(@fig:4vba b).@sun2007 RAFT polymerization of VBA has been
395reported,@sun2007 but not ATRP.
396
397#figure(image("Images/C5F9.png", width: 100.0%),
398 placement: auto,
399 caption: [
400 Proposed routes to aldehyde functionalized styrenic monomer for improved reactive bottlebrush polymers.
401 ]
402)
403<fig:4vba>
404
405=== Mechanosensitive nanocapsule thermosets
406<mechanosensitive-nanocapsule-thermosets>
407While the \"grafting from\" method excels at producing bottlebrush
408polymers with long side chains, it also produces ill-defined polymers.
409Residual initiating sites on side chain ends can also cause irreversible
410crosslinking in the solid phase, limiting their shelf life.
411Additionally, control over the final brush architecture is limited to
412only being able to adjust the sequence of the side chains, meaning the
413ends of the brush always presented exposed reactive groups to the
414environment, resulting in rapid crosslinking. Though it was not
415quantified, the initiation efficiency and monomer conversion for the
416bottlebrush side chains was likely quite low.@neugebauer2015 It's
417possible this could be avoided by an ATRP approach favoring deactivation
418of the propagating radicals.@xie2018 I propose to use the \"grafting
419through\" technique, by which olefin terminated macromonomers are
420polymerized into bottlebrushes, to create a new class of
421mechanosensitive \"nanocapsule\" bottlebrush thermosets that are able to
422crosslink in response to weak shear forces.
423
424While the \"grafting through\" technique is not able to prepare
425bottlebrushes with side chain lengths matching that of \"grafting
426from,\" it possesses several advantages of its own. Linear macromonomers
427are able to be easily characterized prior to polymerization into
428bottlebrush polymers, meaning the length of bottlebrush hairs can be
429precisely tuned. Different bottlebrush morphologies (comb, rodlike side
430chain, stretched backbone, stretched sidechain) can be precisely
431prepared. Bottlebrush block copolymers can be easily prepared by
432sequential addition of macromonomers. Additionally, bottlebrush polymers
433prepared this way possess a side chain on every monomer (if only
434macromonomers are polymerized).
435
436#figure(image("Images/C5F10.png", width: 100.0%),
437 placement: auto,
438 caption: [
439 Mechanosensitive nanocapsule thermosets expose a reactive core in
440 response to shear forces.
441 ]
442)
443<fig:nanocapsule>
444
445Steric repulsion between side chains of densely grafted bottlebrush
446polymers is known to induce significant tension along the polymer
447backbone, on the order of nanonewtons,@panyukov2009 the same or higher
448than the force required to break C--C
449bonds.@grandbois1999@willis-fox2018 These prestrained brushes may be
450easier to mechanochemically cleave, exposing the reactive core (@fig:nanocapsule). Indeed, it has been shown that the limiting contour
451length for bottlebrush polymers is dramatically shorter than linear
452polymers, and bottlebrush polymers approach this limit under sonication
453much more quickly.@li2016 Other methods of inducing strain, such as
454parallel plate shear or extrusion, may be able to \"activate\" molecular
455brushes with a reactive core more easily, particularly those in the
456stretched backbone regime or those adsorbed to surfaces, which can
457experience up to 100 nN of tension along the backbone. Scission at the
458hair-backbone junction will also generate unshielded reactive linear
459polymers.@peterson2019@peterson2021@noh2021 Further, the propensity for
460hairs to be released into solution can be tuned by weakening the
461alkoxyamine C--O bond with highly sterically hindered nitroxides
462(proposed structure #strong[1]),@pauly2025@jing2014 or by preparing
463bottlebrush polymers in the stretched side chain regime.
464
465#figure(image("Images/C5F11.png", width: 100.0%),
466 placement: auto,
467 caption: [
468 Proposed polymerization and chain-end chlorination of amine
469 functional styrenes.
470 ]
471)
472<fig:polymerchlor>
473
474Complementary amine functionalized bottlebrush crosslinkers should be
475prepared as well. Amine functional styrenes protected with
476trimethylsilane groups have been prepared by living anionic
477polymerization.@hirao2002 Carbanion chain ends of polymers prepared by
478living anionic polymerization can be easily converted to terminal
479chlorines for use in ATNRC (@fig:polymerchlor).@satoh2019 It's
480possible that protected amine functional styrenes could be directly
481polymerized by ATRP, though aryl amines (R = NH#sub[2]) will likely
482polymerize slowly if at all by increasing the dissociation energy of the
483chain end carbon-halogen bond and slowing propagation.@yoshioka2019
484Choosing a strongly hydrogen bonding solvent may be able to overcome
485this by reducing the electron donating ability of the amine through
486intermolecular interactions. There are some reports of polymerization of
487unprotected 4-(vinylaniline) by ATRP.@rebelo2019 In any case, the amines
488should remain protected until use as they will both deactivate the ROMP
489catalyst preventing bottlebrush synthesis@sutthasupa2010 and the
490unprotected amines are unstable in air.@suzuki1989
491
492Alternative reactive monomers include 4-vinylphenyloxirane,
4934-vinylphenyl glycidyl ether, 4-vinylphenol, 4-vinylthiophenol,
4944-(2-mercaptoethyl)styrene, and 4-vinylbenzoic acid.
495
496=== Xanthogen disulfide optimization and hydrogel stereolithography
497<xanthogen-disulfide-optimization-and-hydrogel-stereolithography>
498The design and synthesis of chain transfer agents for the RAFT process
499has been much studied since the process was first introduced.@keddie2012
500RAFT agents typically take the form of #strong[2] (@fig:waterxanth). The Z group (in this case O-ethyl) is generally
501responsible for modifying the rate of addition of propagating radicals
502and the rate of fragmentation of intermediate radicals in the main RAFT
503equilibrium. R is generally meant to act as an excellent homolytic
504leaving group capable of initiating polymerization. I use a symmetrical
505xanthogen disulfide, meaning modifications to the R group
506can be ignored.
507
508#figure(image("Images/C5F12.png", width: 100.0%),
509 placement: auto,
510 caption: [
511 Proposed xanthate structures.
512 ]
513)
514<fig:waterxanth>
515
516Xanthogens (Z = OR$'$) are chiefly used for the polymerization of less
517activated monomers. Xanthates have dramatically lower reactivity towards
518radical addition, qualitatively understood by the resonance contribution
519of the oxygen lone pair to the C=S double bond, meaning more activated
520monomers ((meth)acryloyl monomers) which produce less reactive radical
521species do contributing to lower transfer constants of the xanthate and
522poorer control. However, the C=S double bond can be made more reactive
523by lessening the contribution of the oxygen lone pair by installing
524electron withdrawing groups attached to the oxygen, lessening the
525contribution of the oxygen lone pair on the C=S double bond. Xanthates
526possessing the Z groups of #strong[3]@li2018a and
527#strong[4]@destarac2002 have shown superior control over polymerization
528of acrylic monomers, importantly with no change in polymerization
529kinetics, and should be explored as xanthogen disulfide photoiniferters.
530
531More pressingly for biomedical applications is the solubility of the
532chain transfer agent. My chosen xanthate is easy to synthesize, but is
533not water soluble, nor are #strong[3] or #strong[4]. Thus, I propose to
534develop zwitterionic xanthogen disulfides as photoiniferters. #strong[5]
535will likely provide excellent control of acryloyl functional monomers
536and excellent solubility. It should be cautioned however that while
537adding electron withdrawing Z (where Z is O--R' and R' is alkyl or aryl)
538groups to the RAFT agent will improve the control of certain monomers,
539it will also increase the susceptibility of it to aminolysis and
540hydrolysis, which will complicate cytocompatible polymerizations in
541water.@thomas2004@moad2005 Tertiary alcohols should be avoided such that
542Z does not become a good homolytic leaving group.@stenzel2003@coote2003
543
544Additionally, I propose to utilize the dormant xanthogen chain ends to
545introduce and pattern hydrogels post polymerization. The 3D network
546structure of synthetic hydrogels nicely mimics the mechanical properties
547of the native cellular environment, but not the chemical properties.
548Synthetic materials, like PEG, tend to be both chemically inert and
549difficult to for cells to adhere to, long noted for their antifouling
550properties.@zhu2010 Hydrogels should be selectively functionalized by
551stereolithography with RGD adhesion points, as well as selectively
552increasing or decreasing the modulus of hydrogels. The necessary
553N-acryloyl functional oligopeptides are conveniently accessible by
554protease catalyzed peptide synthesis,@edson2023 and some work has been
555done polymerizing N-acryloyl amino acids.@bentolila2000@li2018