jcs's openbsd hax
openbsd
1$OpenBSD: NOTES,v 1.2 1996/06/23 14:30:49 deraadt Exp $
2$NetBSD: NOTES,v 1.2 1995/03/18 14:56:29 cgd Exp $
3
4POSIX and init:
5--------------
6
7POSIX.1 does not define 'init' but it mentions it in a few places.
8
9B.2.2.2, p205 line 873:
10
11 This is part of the extensive 'job control' glossary entry.
12 This specific reference says that 'init' must by default provide
13 protection from job control signals to jobs it starts --
14 it sets SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN and SIGTTOU to SIG_IGN.
15
16B.2.2.2, p206 line 889:
17
18 Here is a reference to 'vhangup'. It says, 'POSIX.1 does
19 not specify how controlling terminal access is affected by
20 a user logging out (that is, by a controlling process
21 terminating).' vhangup() is recognized as one way to handle
22 the problem. I'm not clear what happens in Reno; I have
23 the impression that when the controlling process terminates,
24 references to the controlling terminal are converted to
25 references to a 'dead' vnode. I don't know whether vhangup()
26 is required.
27
28B.2.2.2, p206 line 921:
29
30 Orphaned process groups bear indirectly on this issue. A
31 session leader's process group is considered to be orphaned;
32 that is, it's immune to job control signals from the terminal.
33
34B.2.2.2, p233 line 2055:
35
36 'Historically, the implementation-dependent process that
37 inherits children whose parents have terminated without
38 waiting on them is called "init" and has a process ID of 1.'
39
40 It goes on to note that it used to be the case that 'init'
41 was responsible for sending SIGHUP to the foreground process
42 group of a tty whose controlling process has exited, using
43 vhangup(). It is now the responsibility of the kernel to
44 do this when the controlling process calls _exit(). The
45 kernel is also responsible for sending SIGCONT to stopped
46 process groups that become orphaned. This is like old BSD
47 but entire process groups are signaled instead of individual
48 processes.
49
50 In general it appears that the kernel now automatically
51 takes care of orphans, relieving 'init' of any responsibility.
52 Specifics are listed on the _exit() page (p50).
53
54On setsid():
55-----------
56
57It appears that neither getty nor login call setsid(), so init must
58do this -- seems reasonable. B.4.3.2 p 248 implies that this is the
59way that 'init' should work; it says that setsid() should be called
60after forking.
61
62Process group leaders cannot call setsid() -- another reason to
63fork! Of course setsid() causes the current process to become a
64process group leader, so we can only call setsid() once. Note that
65the controlling terminal acquires the session leader's process
66group when opened.
67
68Controlling terminals:
69---------------------
70
71B.7.1.1.3 p276: 'POSIX.1 does not specify a mechanism by which to
72allocate a controlling terminal. This is normally done by a system
73utility (such as 'getty') and is considered ... outside the scope
74of POSIX.1.' It goes on to say that historically the first open()
75of a tty in a session sets the controlling terminal. P130 has the
76full details; nothing particularly surprising.
77
78The glossary p12 describes a 'controlling process' as the first
79process in a session that acquires a controlling terminal. Access
80to the terminal from the session is revoked if the controlling
81process exits (see p50, in the discussion of process termination).
82
83Design notes:
84------------
85
86your generic finite state machine
87we are fascist about which signals we elect to receive,
88 even signals purportedly generated by hardware
89handle fatal errors gracefully if possible (we reboot if we goof!!)
90 if we get a segmentation fault etc., print a message on the console
91 and spin for a while before rebooting
92 (this at least decreases the amount of paper consumed :-)
93apply hysteresis to rapidly exiting gettys
94check wait status of children we reap
95 don't wait for stopped children
96don't use SIGCHILD, it's too expensive
97 but it may close windows and avoid races, sigh
98look for EINTR in case we need to change state
99init is responsible for utmp and wtmp maintenance (ick)
100 maybe now we can consider replacements? maintain them in parallel
101 init only removes utmp and closes out wtmp entries...
102
103necessary states and state transitions (gleaned from the man page):
104 1: single user shell (with password checking?); on exit, go to 2
105 2: rc script: on exit 0, go to 3; on exit N (error), go to 1
106 3: read ttys file: on completion, go to 4
107 4: multi-user operation: on SIGTERM, go to 7; on SIGHUP, go to 5;
108 on SIGTSTP, go to 6
109 5: clean up mode (re-read ttys file, killing off controlling processes
110 on lines that are now 'off', starting them on lines newly 'on')
111 on completion, go to 4
112 6: boring mode (no new sessions); signals as in 4
113 7: death: send SIGHUP to all controlling processes, reap for 30 seconds,
114 then go to 1 (warn if not all processes died, i.e. wait blocks)
115Given the -s flag, we start at state 1; otherwise state 2