Plurality#

• Plurality is a political philosophy and framework that seeks to create mechanisms for large-scale cooperation while preserving diversity and autonomy.
  • Plurality stands between [[Governance|Technocracy]] and [[Decentralized Autonomous Organizations|Libertarianism]], offering a third way that emphasizes connections between individuals and groups.
  • The core element is the principle of cooperation across diversity.
  • Plurality recognizes that there is no single model that can explain the world perfectly, and we should use a combination of different models instead.
  • Pluralism has two sides: institutional (fostering cooperation between diverse groups vs. atomistic individualism or centralistic universalism) and epistemic (embracing diverse ways of knowing vs. single rational logic or technocracy).
  • Plurality offers a distinct technological vision from AI (which seeks singular "general" intelligence) and Web3 (which focuses on "sovereign individuals"), instead building on the internet's "network of networks" architecture where diverse local communities use interoperable protocols.
• [[Identity]] should be intersectional and social, using the entire set of a person's actions and interactions to determine trustworthiness.
• [[Governance]] mechanisms should count uncorrelated signals additively but correlated signals with diminishing returns.
• [[Organizations|Organizations]] should allow different degrees of membership, not just true-or-false.
• Local currencies and property rights can coexist with global mechanisms for cooperation.
• We should understand the world through a patchwork combination of models, and not try to stretch any single model beyond its natural applicability.
• There is a set of principled mathematical techniques by which you can design social, political and economic mechanisms that treat not just individuals, but also connections between individuals as a first-class object.
• We should take connections between individuals really seriously, and work to expand and strengthen healthy connections.
• Plurality technologies include:
  • Polis for large-scale conversations that identify consensus across different viewpoints.
  • Community Notes that surface content rated highly by people who disagree on other topics.
  • Message Checker and other user-facing tools that protect users while preserving autonomy.
  • Quadratic funding and other mechanisms that subsidize collaboration between different groups.
• Plurality is compatible with:
  • Exponential technological growth, by designing property rights that force rising tides to lift all boats.
  • Valuing excellence and expertise, through mechanisms like prediction markets with per-person subsidies.
  • Local experimentation in social media, blockchain ecosystems, and local government.
• When different people disagree about how things should be done, it's healthy to have a bias toward solutions where both versions exist at least somewhere, and people can freely choose between them. Peacefully making something small in a corner somewhere to see how it plays out is the most productive and least risky way for any actor to implement their vision. It provides rapid feedback about whether ideas actually work in reality.
• Ideas like this can enable open-source communities, collections of countries, and other groups that are not actors to have higher levels of diffusion between each other, allowing them to share more economies of scale and remain competitive with more internally organized centralized behemoths.