core
Monorepo for Tangled tangled.org
Star 1.4k
Fork 235
Watch

feat: private repositories #60

Open shi.gg
Open opened by shi.gg

As the title implies, private repositories, with seperate view and push access permissions.

psychedeli.ca

atproto doesn't have a concept of "private data" at the moment (we're working on it!), so even if you configured knot's git server to only work with authenticated users on the box, your issues and pull requests will still be public. not even sure if that's possible, honestly...it's just the way i'd think to secure a "bare" git server that doesn't have a fancy UI or anything.

shi.gg

I am very well aware of that — but I thought a tracking issue for when it's possible wouldn't hurt.

bdbch.com

@shi.gg of course - just wanted to add more context around the state of private repositories. I'm still waiting for a solution - I think then ATProto could potentially pop off as a really great solution also for non-social apps.

nolith.dev

Any change we can run a private knot server, not internet facing, and use it to host private repos? I'm all fine if issues are public as long as the content of the repo stays private

This comment was deleted.
logandupont.com

The Bluesky team is working on a solution for this called 'Permissioned Data'. You can read more about this in the 'Permissioned Data Diaries' (currently 4 parts).

https://dholms.leaflet.pub/3meluqcwky22a

psychedeli.ca
anorak01.at.anorak01.top

Lets hope this results in Tangled private repo support soonish...

This comment was deleted.
runlevel0.me
ch0.dev

With it now being 2 months since spaces was announced, can an update on the development of private repos be provided? Has implementation started, and what would a rough ETA look like for a first version of it?

gregmorenz.bsky.social
timofey.tngl.sh

I bought a domain to selfhost Tangled on, in anticipation of private repos. This better be good.

Sign up or Sign in to add to the discussion.